Democrats vow to play fair...

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar

I just recieved an e-mail that someone forwarded from the Rev. Jill Martinez and her campaign team. It is a pledge for democratic candidates running to replace Gallegly are being asked to sign.

Is it just a campaign stunt? Should other candidates sign pledges? If there was such a pledge for other campaigns what should it include?

Democrats
, will you vote for a candidate that won't sign the pledge?

Click on the continue reading link below to read the pledge.

Fair Campaign Pledge for Democratic Candidates
Participating in the June 6, 2006, 24th Congressional District Primary

Introduction

Democracies thrive when elections galvanize citizens and residents behind candidates articulating policy ideas and approaches that are both principled and pragmatic. Democracies suffer when personal attacks, opportunistic posturing, and the politics of division eclipse policy discussions.

To seek elected office is to seek volunteer support, individual donations, and action in the ballot box.

Americans are at present as concerned with transparency, accountability, and ending the culture of corruption, as with issues of health, learning, mobilization, work, environment, security and peace.

Consequently, to currently seek elected office ought signify more than rhetoric concerning openness, responsibility, as well as the words and actions of both those campaigning and elected to serve.

The citizens and residents of the 24th Congressional District have received no assurance from their elected representative that he will address the moral and ethical failings of those holding power in Washington DC. Instead, he has committed thousands of dollars to the defense of at least one of those asked to resign.

The Democrats in Ventura and Santa Barbara Counties seeking to unseat this twenty-year incumbent must stand in sharp contrast to figures guided by lobbyist dollars and backroom deals, as well as those who believe that mudslinging and subversive strategies are acceptable and justifiable if they yield victory.

Thus, for the sake of the people, all Democratic campaigns must henceforth leave resentments and mistakes behind and commit material resources to the detailed articulation and realization of common goals. Now is the time to do what must be done to achieve victory in November.

Contentions

A significant component of the American promise is the equal opportunity to seek public office regardless of socioeconomic class and racial/ethnic, cultural, religious, gender or sexual identity—everyone has the right to run and no one other than the candidate herself/himself decides whether to continue or step down.

Democrats, independents, and Republicans dissatisfied with the voting record and contemporary priorities of the 20-year incumbent currently representing the 24th Congressional District, (indeed, all Americans asked to vote anywhere) deserve to bear witness to a Primary campaign in which all candidates speak to the issues of the day by articulating policy ideas and approaches that are both principled and pragmatic.

If the Democrat garnering the most votes on June 6, 2006, emerges victorious only because she/he is the least affected by personal attacks, opportunistic posturing, and the politics of division, it is no victory at all—a candidate should win because of the strength of her/his vision for tomorrow and subsequent plan directing the District, the nation, and the globe toward the future, not because she/he is the least bloody.

The 24th Congressional District is gerrymandered in such a way that it will prove highly difficult for any candidate securing the Democratic nomination to emerge victorious in November without a commitment by all candidates to pool resources in the Primary, in order to engage in a competitive general election marked by clean money and wide-scale voter education, voter registration, and voter contact efforts.

Fair Campaign Pledge

We, the undersigned, intend to conduct ourselves, in a fair and honorable manner befitting those seeking to represent the citizens and residents of the 24th Congressional District. We recognize that we all have the common goal of defeating the 20-year incumbent who has voted 95% of the time with the elite and extreme wing of his party’s leadership, at the expense of the constituents he is sworn to represent.

We understand that to ultimately win this seat in the general election we must focus on debating the issues and policies that set the Democratic Party apart and to avoid personally attacking one another.

We understand, more than ever that Democrats need to work together because the District, the nation, and the world need policy ideas that are better or different from the ones presently employed. In order to put a Democrat from the 24th in the House of Representatives, we need to capture the imagination of active and inactive voters. In order to accomplish this objective we must abandon any petty or irresponsible strategy that calls for any of us to define ourselves at the expense of our fellow Democrats in this race.

And we understand that history has shown that going negative results in candidates covered in mud and thus ill prepared to take on the incumbent in a meaningful, comprehensive, and competitive manner.

Accepting these premises and the above-written contentions, we commit to the following pledge:

I pledge to conduct my Primary campaign in the 24th Congressional District in an open and fair fashion—I will discuss policy issues and participate in reasonable debate with respect to my views and qualifications.
I will not engage in, nor permit any defamatory attacks upon the character or identity of my opponents—I shall not appeal to, and I shall condemn appeals to rumors of unconfirmed allegations, as well as divisive commentary related to socioeconomic class and racial/ethnic, cultural, religious, gender or sexual identity.
I will not permit the posting of any statement, the creation of any campaign material, or the release of any advertisement that distorts, exaggerates, falsifies or otherwise misrepresents factual information related to my professional record and policy positions or the record and positions of any other candidate.
And I will henceforth immediately and unwaveringly repudiate the actions and/or words of any individual or group (stranger, staff, volunteer, donor, family or friend) acting in violation of the spirit of this Pledge.
Fair Campaign Action Plan
The following first steps are suggested in order to ensure even application and enforcement of the Pledge:
A neutral committee of five persons from the Ventura and Santa Barbara County Democratic Central Committees will serve to facilitator and monitor the above provisions and stipulations—three members will be from Ventura and two members from Santa Barbara, thus acknowledging the District’s population distribution, and avoiding potential stalemate votes. This committee sets forth compliance guidelines.
Successful fair campaigns have been orchestrated in the United States and abroad. As such, we strongly suggest the adoption of the following three already-tested approaches for an election of this magnitude:
1. The committee requires all candidates to address policy issues and not personal issues in its mailings. Therefore, it requests they turnover all mailing lists and email lists presently used for the purposes of newsletter-style updates, and dedicate these to a guided discussion of policy ideas and approaches:
A. Each candidate agrees to no longer send out an individual newsletter-style update.
B. The committee sends one combined newsletter-style update periodically for all candidates that makes it possible to simultaneously compare and contrast stated positions and approaches issue by issue.

2. The committee requires all candidates to commit resources to a District-wide voter registration drive. Therefore it requires they provide the volunteer lists and resources to set-up and operate voter registration tables, and proactively pursue new votes throughout the 24th—including those of new property-owners, new renters, 18-year-olds, college and university persons, new citizens, and non-English-speaking voters.

4. The committee requests that all candidates adhere to a cap in total Primary spending, and restrictions limiting the manner in which this money may be spent. Therefore protecting all candidates from entering into debt, allowing the victorious candidate to stand on more equal footing with the 20-year incumbent throughout the general election cycle, and preserving the integrity of all the Democrats presently seeking office by eliminating cash-flows dedicated to negative campaigns perpetrated by internet, radio, mail, etc.
In signing this, I assume responsibility for my campaign and all its elements, agree to uphold the conditions contained within this Pledge, and to abide by the conditions outlined in the Action Plan.

J. Martinez [Signature 2/22/06]_____________________________________________________
Jill Martinez, Candidate Date


U. Montes-Irueste [Signature 2/22/06]_____________________________________________________
Unai Montes, Campaign Manager for Jill Martinez Date


_____________________________________________________
Mary Pallant, Candidate Date


_____________________________________________________
Christopher Robson, Acting Campaign Manager for Mary Pallant Date

_____________________________________________________
Michael Strickland, Candidate Date


_____________________________________________________
, Campaign Manager for Michael Strickland Date

_____________________________________________________
Brett Wagner, Candidate Date


_____________________________________________________________________
Michael Carpenter, Campaign Manager for Brett Wagner Date

5 Comments

Brian,
Many years ago, Sandy Webb who was running for re-election actually did this (asked for pledges or a signed contract) for her campaign....Don't know if it worked, but some people thought she was nuts.....guess she was just ahead of her time.

Brian:

Can you define what fair means? I think what Jill Martinez means is she wants no one to attack that she just moved here like an opportunist carpet bagger.

Gina,

Why don't you focus on issues? Is it because in generic ballot tests Republicans are being outscored in numbers not seen in modern history?

Anyways, I think a discussion of issues would help everyone of all parties.

To the Democratic campaigns:

Are you guys signing the pledge as is, or will you sign it with a few changes?

Will you sign it even if every canididate does not?

Have you heard a response yet from the Brett Wagner campaign?

Are you going to extend it to other Democrats running in the area?

brian-

Campaigns aren't just about beer and skittles. As soon as I ask what is fair, you say issues are fair. Well, my issue is Jill Martinez is not from around here...

I have talked about issues on this blog. For instance, Pallant likes to play "fiscal responsibility".

We are being fiscally responsible. We are giving back the money to people that actually earn it.

The reason voters might be switching sides has more to do with the fact that democrats are scaring up votes.

Democrats are so angry that people are starting to have some control over their own lives financially and that we are killing the big super state financially that they are parading around the country scaring up for votes.

See, the population has been controlled by big government for too long and their friends in the media. Voters are probably nervous because we are actually asking normal citizens to use their god given talents to create their own wealth in society.

Democrats are threatened when people are free from state control. To democrats, the citizens were designed to provide them with state wealth.

This whole concept is foreign to them. They would prefer the economic gulag of the 1930's.

Not to be a stickler Gina, but what the heck are you talking about? Jill Martinez lived for many years in the 24th Congressional District and then the District was redrawn at some point between the Michael Case 2000 and the Brett Wagner 2004 run. This redrawing of the District caused Jill's old house to get sucked up into the 23rd District. So basically as best I understand it when Brett ran she was living in Lois Capps's District and voting for her. But as of right now--a.k.a. the time she is filing her papers and making her candidacy official--she is living in a little house located comfortably inside the borders of the 24th District. Anyway, all of this is foolish and irrelevant because anybody who took the time to look would find records of Jill's work in the construction and rennovation of affordable housing units in inland Santa Barbara County (i.e. well inside the present borders and always inside the borders of the 24th). So anyway, long story short, I don't really get what you're talking about Gina. But I'm pretty concerned that your whole focus on Jill's housing situation ignores the fact that Brett and Mary have also both moved and changed residences in recent years. I mean I was sitting in the room when Brett said he moved so that when he LOSES against Gallegly he can turn around and take advantage of his name recognition and run for the State Assembly District seat that is scheduled to open up because its current occupant is on the verge of "terming out." And while I have yet to get a straight answer from anyone working on her campaign about how long exactly Mary has been living in Oak park, I know that everytime I go to her website and check out the scrolling endorsement screen to see if anyone has added onto or taken their name down from the endorsement list, all I see are Hollywood, Malibu, and the San Fernando Valley names and pictures from events taking place a good hour or more outside of the District. So anyway, all I am saying is if we were equally nice to or hard on everyone with relation to how many times they've moved where and why, (and made a big issue out of it) all the candidates would have to provide some kind of explanation. I care about the issues talked about on the news and the kinds of work that needs to be done in order to beat Gallegly. I don't care about fancy speeches with lots of applause lines. I don't care about pretty pictures or flashy graphics. I want to beat Elton and then send someone up there with a real plan--a.k.a. a person who has ideas abut how to get to work right away on fixing things, and not somebody who is just trying to schmooze their way into a cushy job, a higher office, or some tax-payer subsidized on the job training that leads to a cushy job as a Fox news analyst or a consultant to a lobbyist's firm.

Leave a comment

Brian Dennert here

This blog is dedicated to Ventura County politics. Send in ideas for posts to briandennert@gmail.com
Follow me on Twitter Twitter.com/dennert The Facebook page for this blog is facebook.com/briandennerthere You do not need to register to comment but keep it classy. Report abusive language to me at my email address.

  • Burt: Not to be a stickler Gina, but what the heck read more
  • Gina Timmons: brian- Campaigns aren't just about beer and skittles. As soon read more
  • brian: Gina, Why don't you focus on issues? Is it because read more
  • Gina Timmons: Brian: Can you define what fair means? I think what read more
  • Barbra Williamson: Brian, Many years ago, Sandy Webb who was running for read more