( Click on picture to see the original.)
The text reads: Proudly Serving
California's Thirty Seventh Assembly District
Camarillo, Fillmore, Los Angeles, Moorpark, Ojai, Santa Paula, Simi Valley, Thousand Oaks, Chatsworth
Here is a map of the district:
( Click for larger size map.)
I am just curious? Where in the district is that awesome beach?
The Ventura County Star is currently holding a photography contest. That beach might make a great scene.
First person to point out where in the district that beach is wins a prize.
It sure ain't in AD37! Either it's near Pismo, Baja or the Virgin Islands.
Seems our proud politicos can't seem to figure out what it is they're proud of. See the Liz Dole blooper about protecting our nation...with French fighter jets.
If it wasn't obvious I was making a Colbert reference in the title.
Maybe she is using photos of districts she would rather represent?
She is clearly trying to make herself look more green by showing outdoor pictures. Too bad her voting doesn't match the background.
She might be a nice woman but she doesn't represent change and she won't be doing much for this area.
What exactly was her biggest bill? Something helping private schools that focus on sports?
She doesn't represent the people of this district. Maybe she should retire to that beach area!
Audra and her husband, Tony, are both devoted environmentalists.
Tony has started a company, GreenWave Energy Solutions, which has as its sole purpose to find alternative energy sources to help reduce our dependence on foreign oil.
Audra is fighting very hard to keep a 1,500 bed prison out of Camarillo that would have devastating affects on the environment.
Those who spoke up last on the SSFL cleanup, after all the work had been done and the deal was made, can't possibly be considered "devoted environmentalists". Where was the help during the past 22 years as local SSFL activists where given the cold shoulder by Tony?
As for the coincidence of announcing his alternative energy venture in the same breath as his intention to run for a state senate seat, there have been plenty of people jumping on the "environmental" bandwagon this election cycle, in a cynical effort to change the color of their campaign signs from red to green.
How about we judge the candidates on what they've done in the past and not on what they say they intend to do now.
If they are such environmentalist then where in their legislative records do you find proof of that at all? Cameron Smyth passed an environmental law, they talk about it.