Weather | Beachcam
Contact Us | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Subscribe to the paper

HomeBlogsMy Iraqi Soldiers

Technically and Tactically Profecient

| | Comments (6)

Part of the NCO creed requires that we all vow to be technically and tactically profecient, soldiers lives depend on it. What this basically means is that as military leaders we can combine the technical knowledge of weapons systems and their capabilities with tactical know how and give the men in our command the maximum oppurtunity to survive and win.

For example, a soldier might understand the range of a particular machine gun used for the defense can be bipod or tripod fired. The maximume effective range for a bipod fired weapon is generally about half that of a tripod fired weapon. He may also know that this particular weapon has three rates of fire, sustained, rapid and cyclic. The rates of fire a weapon is used at will determine the length the weapon can be fired and how much ammunition will be needed. He might also understand the trajectory of the rounds through the air at different ranges, and the pattern of impact on the selected target ( The Beaten Zone ) . A soldier will then take this knowledge and apply it to the tactical situation. Knowing the best position to emplace the weapon and how to use it, this is tactical and technical knowledge.

MSG Morrill was almost completly void of both tactics and technical know how. His insistance on doing what he felt was best instead of listening to those that actually knew what to do placed many soldiers lives at risk, I will give just few more examples of this mans incompetance.

While going through weapons firing drills prior to coming home one of the men firing the machine gun was clearly firing at the cyclic rate, holding down the trigger and just firing away at over 800 rounds a minute. Morrill jumped up on the turrett of the vehicle and started screaming about how the weapon should never be fired at more than three to five rounds a burst or squeeze of the trigger, not true at all. Most machine guns will be fired at the basic rate of six to nine rounds per burst, gunners say "Six to nine everytime". This is the sustained rate of fire allowing ten minutes of firing befor a barrell change. The rapid rate of fire is ten to twenty rounds a burst before a barrell change at five minutes. The cyclic rate is just holding down the trigger for one minute, then changing the barrell or it will malfunction and possibly melt. There is a time and place for each rate of fire," tactics". Morrill was just faking knowledge knowing that he would not be openly challenged. The man was so arrogant he would have people follow his direction even though it was wrong and men could get hurt. A three to five round burst would not be enough to effectivly cover a small area target like another crew served weapon emplacement and the " Beaten Zone " lacked area, of course he wouldn't know this.

Here's another example of him not wanting to learn the proper way of doing something and insisting on what he had decided on, right or wrong.

It is a common belief that speed is one of the biggest defense factors to be considered when traveling on the MSRs ( Main Supply Routes ) the faster a vehicle can move the harder it will be for the trigger man to set of the IED and inflict damage on the target. Well Morrill took this as an absolute and would make us drive as fast as possible at all times and never considered using one of the Armys mandated tools, the "Risk Assessment". This is just what it sounds like, pior to taking a course of action or begining training, leaders should consider all variables that may effect the mission and decide if the risk is a minimal as possible. To lower the risk, some things must be altered or simply left out. Don't take a risk you don't have too.

Early in our deplyment we had run a six vehicle convoy about fifty miles north to Tikrit. As we were leaving FOB O'Ryan we came to an MP checkpoint, I was in the lead vehicle and was ordered to stop by the MPs. At this point none of us knew thew reason for the stop but did know on the main road we were safe and abviosly the MP's had secured the immediate area. Morrill, like the egomaniacal person he is, called foward on the radio and instructed us to go around the MP's. To do this we would have to leave the security of the hard packed road and travel on the shoulder were most all IED's are placed, he was ready to risk getting us in the lead vehicle blown to pieces just to show his authority over us and bypass an MP roadblock. My driver who had been there a year already and was from th 81st out of Washington couldn't believe what he had heard, he had already seen members of his unit killed doing just that. Luckily the MP's waved us through before we exposed our under bellies to a possible IED. But this was just the begining of Morrills exposing the men to death.

On the way back from Tikrit later that day we were on MSR Tampa southbound. We were a convoy of six HUMVEES and were moving at about sixty-five miles an hour when we came up on the rear of a much larger convoy alomost one mile long, they were moving a little faster than fifty miles an hour. From past guidance from Morrill it was decided we would pass this convoy and, therefore, reduce the risk of getting hit by an IED, at least that was his theory.

We could clearly see it was far too large a convoy to pass on the same road and many of the bigger heavier vehicles couldn't see us from the rear and might run into us. So it was decided we would cross over the center median, jump into the northbound lane and drive head-on into oncoming traffic. What this meant was that top heavy vehicles prone to overturning and some modified with metal plates would cross over at different points in the median. This would first expose us to explosions from underneath, secondly we would do so at a high rate of speed and risk flipping over in the loose soil, next we possibly crash head first into on coming traffic and lastly we would now have to possible engage unsuspecting oncoming Iraqi traffic.( I must point out that 25% of all deaths in Iraq are from accidents and most of those are vehicle accidents )

As we crossed over into the oncoming lanes we encountered a oncoming coalition convoy almost exactly like the one we just passed, big, heavy and fast. It was coming right at us and kicking up alot of dust and debris. Often times we came within inches of a headon collision. I will say that was one of the most dangerous exposures I had seen in Iraq. I lost sight of our vehicle to the front many times and know we suprised many of the drivers coming towards us, communiction between us and both convoys was not feasable although possible with some effort.

As we cleared the end of the first convoy after a solid five minutes of dust and near accidents we again exposed ourselves to IED's by crossing the dirt median. Even if we had been able to cross at the exact same point we just gave an insurgent six chances to kill Americans.

Was it worth the risk ? I will just say that when I got hit by an IED on MSR Tampa in May we were going over sixty miles an hour. The only thing that spared us from death was the lack of training on timing on the part of the trigger man that day. Does speed help ? Yes, of course it does but prudent thinking dictates that one not assume a dozen more risks just to got five MPH faster.

Guys like Morrill are all over the Reserve and Gaurd system and really need to go away. I will say also that Major Harris was our Executive Officer and only acting commander. I liked him and found him rational and amiable and can not understand why Morrill was given the power of life and death over so many good men. I have a theory on that I will share soon and it has to do with politics and numbers.

My next entry will be the last to focus on Morrill simply because I think most readers have a good picture of this guy. I could make dozens more entires on the poor performance of this guy and end up not mentioning some of the great men of Konohiki that really held things together. Even though most of them did not recieve a "Bronze Star" for meritorious conduct on the 19th of December 2005.

6 Comments

SSG Banales, I enjoy reading your blogs. I have a daughter who is a Civil Affairs Officer still in Iraq. I will talk to my daughter about this and ensure our young men and women in arms are not exposed to this type of maneuver nor leadership judgement.


I came in to reading your blogs with an open mind and while being misunderstood by some readers, I have reserved some of my knowledge until now. You seem to have made your point about Morrill and I now believe your stories. It really is unfortunate that such leadership is allowed in our military, especially when men and women of our armed services are putting their life on the line. Only to be led by extremely poor leaders!

Your comment though regarding this Major Robert Harris who was acting as commander seems off to me and maybe your opinion is simply because you are not an officer and therefore only knew what he has allowed you to know. I happen to know for a fact, from other officers who were there with you and worked right beside him, that he totally agreed with every decision made by Morrill. He verbally expressed great distaste for you, your opinion, and your actions as an NCO to many. In his eyes your concerns or complaints were unfounded and not worthy of addressing. I think the truth would be that he was too lazy to consider your side or the mens side, or maybe he just couldn't be bothered with the hassle of replacing Morrill. I dont know, I'm not him, but it should definitely be looked in to further!

The fact that you have gone to great lengths in telling your side of the story and others here have backed you tells me that this executive officer was maybe an even bigger jackass then Morrill. As I have said before, you can only do what you are allowed to do and here lies the answer to all of this. This Maj Harris was in charge therefore he is responsible. Period! He knew what this man Morrill was doing and chose to allow it or ignore it. Either way it was detrimental to the units safety! He is the one who should be looked at closer! This leads me to my next question - Why hasn't anyone filed formal complaints on both Morrill and Harris? Neither one of these men should ever be in charge of another combat unit!

Do your duty soldier and report what happened over there so that men and women can feel a little safer under their commands. Writing these blogs is great therapy for you but do the right thing and take control of this situation. Good luck to you!


I just looked through your postings and amazingly my comment is not there. Do you not post comments that disagree with you?
Or is the Freedom of Speech only a one way street for your dissention and those that agree with you?

TOM


Elias, is Tom the retired 1SG correct? If the retired 1SG is correct then your blog is one sided. But again, THIS IS YOUR BLOG.

Carry on.

AIRBORNE!


To Banales and all who read this,

I have read your blogs since September of last year, since I wasn't allowed to return to TFK for medical reasons. I did this at first in attempt to stay abreast of what was going on with TFK. With that said most of what you have entered is correct. I have strong issues with your opinions and point of view in some of your blogs. But this last one Technically and Tactically Proficient, as to the patrol you were stopped by the MP's, I do not recall this one so i cant dispute the legitimacy of it, as to the second part of this patrol you talk about being behind the convoy i do not believe you are correct on this. I was the lead vehicle on that part of the patrol, the convoy ahead of us was doing 35 to 40 mph and was impassable. Being behind such a large and slow moving convoy is a much larger tactical risk than crossing over the meridian. With that said the Iraqi people know to move out of our way, for their safety and ours. Yes we did pass another military patrol going north as we were going south and gave one another room to maneuver. There are hazards in doing this as you pointed out we didn't have the best vehicles and yes it is dusty when crossing, but this is much better than getting rpg'd or ied' behind a slow moving convoy. If this is the patrol that I think it was, that same night at the debriefing you brought up your points and concerns about the return trip from Tikrit. If I remember correctly you concerns were recognized, after much discussion, it was in the opinion of the OIC not the NCOIC, i.e. MSG Morrill, that made the decision to cross over and continue south in the northbound lane. As is often done by many patrols in Iraq for safety and tactical reasons.
These are my personal opinions and I'm sorry if they cause offense. It seemed that anytime we went outside the wire, you seemed nervous and jumpy and anything risky seemed unacceptable to you. We were in a combat zone doing combat patrols and danger is a part of the job, that's what we are there for. For presence and to engage the enemy. So therefore risk is part of our jobs, choices have to be made and made quickly, sometimes right and sometimes wrong. You need to stop talking about certain tactics and techniques that civilians and the insurgents don't need to know or fully understand. We don't need civilians emailing their family members and trying to dictate what we can and cannot do just because it is risky. I know other task force members may or may not agree with me, but this is how I feel and it was an honor and a privilege to serve with all of you.
Also I would like to take this opportunity since many task force members read this blog, to apologize for not being allowed to return between the surgeons and command I was not allowed to return after my fit for duty letter. This has been a great source of heartache and disappointment for me, and I have thought of you all often.
WELCOME HOME ALL!!!

SPC Brown, TFK


SPC Brown, welcome home as well. Too bad you couldn't make it back. Missed ya, see you when I see you.

SSG B, great blog.

D.


Leave a comment

About this blog...
Bonales.jpg

Elias Banales has lived in Oxnard since 1973. He has a large family with five brothers and three sisters. Banales is a 23-year military veteran with 18 years as a paratrooper.

He recently served a one-year deployment in central Iraq. Banales worked closely with the people and Army of Iraq. He writes about these experiences and the perceptions and opinions of the Iraqis he met along the way.

Bookmark and Share

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by published on February 13, 2006 10:40 PM.

Corrective action and NCO's was the previous entry in this blog.

Screening comments ? is the next entry in this blog.

More to see...