May 2010 Archives

Destroyer charged superior forces in suicide attack in WWII

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 

The Battle of Leyte Gulf was the largest naval battle of World War II and one of the largest in history. When the US Navy defeated the Imperial Japanese Navy there in 1944, it marked the last time the IJN was able to muster a major naval force, and a major part of the battle hinged on the actions of one destroyer.

The USS Johnston was commanded by Ernest E. Evans and he would posthumously earn the Medal of Honor for his conduct at the Battle Off Samar:

The Battle off Samar was the centre most action of the Battle of Leyte Gulf, one of the largest naval battles in history, which took place in the Philippine Sea off Samar Island, in the Philippines on October 25, 1944. As the only major action in the larger battle where the Americans were largely unprepared against the opposing forces, it has been cited by historians as one of the greatest military mismatches in naval history.

 The American forces, which consisted of 6 escort carriers, 3 destroyers (including the Johnston) and 4 destroyer escorts faced off against 4 Japanese battleships, 6 heavy cruisers, and 2 light cruisers. Samuel Eliot Morison, in History of the United States Naval Operations in World War II, wrote, "In no engagement of its entire history has the United States Navy shown more gallantry, guts, and gumption than in those two morning hours between 0730 and 0930 off Samar."

The Japanese had successfully tricked Admiral William Halsey into pursuing a decoy fleet, then sent their powerful main force to attack the unsuspected and outgunned defenders.

Ernest E. Evans, commander of the destroyer Johnston, the closest to the attackers, took the initiative first. He ordered his ship to "flank speed, full left rudder," attacking on his own in what appeared to be a suicide mission.

Johnston blew the bridge off of a Japanese heavy cruiser and effectively disabled a second one with her torpedoes. From seven miles away the battleship Kongo struck the Johnston's deck and engine rooms with a 14-inch shell, cutting its speed in half. Fingers on Evans' left hand were then severed when three shells, possibly from the Japanese super-battleship Yamato, struck Johnston's bridge. The bridge destroyed, Evans moved his command to the aft where men were manually operating the rudder.

Evans noticed that four Japanese destroyers and a light cruiser were moving in on his inadequately protected carriers, and moved in to intercept. Johnston scored hits on all of them and pressured them to prematurely fire their torpedoes. But counterfire disabled a main gun and engines, and she was left dead in the water.

As her attackers gathered around the vulnerable ship, they concentrated fire on her rather than the fleeing carriers. Johnston was hit so many times that one survivor recalled "they couldn't patch holes fast enough to keep her afloat."

American ships were able to drive off the attackers, and Evans finally gave the order to abandon ship. Johnston sank 25 minutes later.

As a Japanese destroyer cruised slowly by, the survivors saw the enemy standing at attention to salute.

Evans' actions were crucial to protecting the Leyte Gulf invasion forces. After that battle, the Japanese forces would never recover, though another year of brutal island-hopping--and two atomic bombs--were necessary to force the Japanese to finally surrender.

Clinton, Obama, and Specter caught playing politics

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 

Those involved in the presidential scandal surrounding the Obama administration's attempt to clear the primary field for Republican-turned-Democrat Arlen Specter serve as a good example of how the game of politics is played when a scandal erupts. And it's played all the time by both parties, at all levels.

Political tactic: Be flexible in your principles

Arlen Specter, who is more accurately called a Democrat-turned-Republican-turned-Democrat, switched parties after his liberal Republican sensitivities--culminating in his support of President Obama's massive healthcare overhaul--all but ensured his defeat in the next Republican primary.

Specter and the Democratic Party must have made a deal last year whereby Specter would register as a Democrat and the Obama administration would help clear the field of Democrats for him. Pursuant to that, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel--a modern day Cesare Borgia--enlisted Bill Clinton to offer Specter's Democratic primary opponent, Joe Sestak, a job in the executive branch.

Specter, for decades a Republican with a spine of boiled okra, realized his own party couldn't stand him. So he flipped, became a Democrat, and gave President Barack Obama the all-important 60th vote in the Senate to stop Republican filibustering.

Obama wanted to protect Specter. And Clinton carried the message: Sestak could remain in Congress and take a fancy appointment to a presidential advisory board.

Political tactic: Deny, deny, deny

Sestak turned down the offer, defeated Specter, and just last week the story hit the front pages. But rumors had been swirling around for months. In Feburary, Sestak was asked about the job offer by journalist Larry Kane. Sestak confirmed the rumor, but would not say what position was offered him.

Kane's station played the report aired all night.  At 6:45 the next morning, 15 hours later, a Deputy Press Secretary called and said, "You can say the White House says it's not true."

Political tactic: When it can't be ignored, make vague statements and hope it goes away

The story really caught fire last week, and the political game then kicked into overdrive as members of the Obama administration ran for cover. On May 23rd, Bob Schieffer of Meet the Press asked White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs about allegations of a job offer.

"I'm not going to get into it," Mr. Gibbs said, "but people who have looked into it assure me the conversations were not inappropriate in any way."

First, they denied. Now they admitted to it with vague language that nothing "inappropriate" was done. Does that mean ethically? Legally? At this point, the administration couldn't ignore the story anymore, but didn't want to advance it with a full admission. They merely hoped it would go away.

Political tactic: When you must make an admission of wrongdoing, do it when nobody is paying attention

It didn't go away and the Obama administration was forced to make a more direct response:

On the Friday before Memorial Day, 100 days later, a classic news dump day, the White House Counsel Robert Bauer issued his report.  He claimed that White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel enlisted the support of Bill Clinton, "who agreed to raise with Congressman Sestak options of service on a Presidential or other Senior Executive Branch Advisory Board."

They chose a Friday on a three-day holiday weekend, when few people are paying attention.  By the time Tuesday rolls around, the politicians will hope that it is "old news."

Has Obama used this tactic before? Right before the last three-day weekend, President's Day, the White House admitted, sort of, that it mishandled the New York trial of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed.

Political tactic: Hide the witnesses

The link to the White House to this scandal is Rahm Emanuel, a Machiavellian political operative with a reputation that mobsters would be proud of. What does Rahm have to say about this? We don't know, he's in Israel.

The trip, to celebrate Emanuel's son's Bar Mitzvah, has been planned since at least November 10th, so it's difficult to accuse the administration of arranging it as a cover up. But Emanuel left a little bit before the Memorial Day break, and one can't help but wonder if he didn't get out of Dodge earlier than expected.

Obama hid Jeremiah Wright in Africa when his scandal broke during the presidential campaign.

Political tactic: Employ proxies to split hairs

If you're a Democrat, you don't want Clinton, Emanuel, or Obama talking about any of this, but you want your message out there. So, proxies are employed to keep the story from being one-sided. The progressive media is perfect for this. Because the job offer was for an unpaid position, it's technically legal. That doesn't necessarily make it OK, but it provides a good talking point to prevent the story from getting out of control from a PR perspective.

Political tactic: Justify bad behavior by pointing to other bad behavior

One of the most common, and fallacious, defensive political tactics is to go on the offensive and blame the other team for the same thing. It's a cheap, but unfortunately effective, trick. White House counsel Robert Bauer said:

"There have been numerous, reported instances in the past when prior administrations -- both Democratic and Republican, and motivated by the same goals -- discussed alternative paths to service for qualified individuals also considering campaigns for public office. Such discussions are fully consistent with the relevant law and ethical requirements."

It didn't work with your mother--"If Bill jumped off of a bridge, would you do it too"--and it doesn't work with people that are paying attention. But dishonest people will employ it to trick those that aren't paying attention.

Political tactic: Underplay

Bill Clinton denied his affair with Monica Lewinsky repeatedly, lying to everyone, then suddenly his people admitted it and said, "So what? It's just sex." If it was no big deal, why did they lie about it for so long. Additionally, they ignored the obstruction of justice charges, which are more than "just sex."

In this job offer scandal, some proxies are saying that Obama has enough to worry about with the oil spill, the bad economy, and foreign affairs to worry about such a matter.

Bottom line

The bottom line is that both parties are actively engaged in lying on a daily basis. They call it public relations, but it's all attempts to present their version of the truth rather than the truth itself. Political operatives will tell you that it's necessary to win and prevent the bad guys from taking over, and they're probably right. As long as the public refuses to pay attention to what their government is doing, the politicians can successfully advance their careers by lying. After a little while, they don't even see it as a deceptive practice--they rationalize it by telling themselves they are just presenting their side of the story.

I don't have much of a problem with an unpaid position being offered. This is common in politics, which isn't an excuse for bad behavior, but I don't really know how bad it is. It's happened everywhere and all throughout history, and I've heard it's happened locally.

It's the president's cover-up that bothers me. I respect Democratic Governor Ed Rendell for saying this on Fox News Sunday:

"I did the same thing in 2006 to ask a former congressman, Joe Hoeffel, to drop out of the race against Bob Casey in the primary... I said, 'Come back and see me if you do it.' He came back and saw me, and he was out of public service. I appointed him as a deputy secretary of commerce. He did a great job."

 

 

 

 

 

Debate moving forward with new moderator

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 

Looks like there's a change in plans--CLU's Herb Gooch will be moderating the 2nd Supervisorial District debate tonight, and so far still only Audra Strickland has confirmed her attendance.

Linda Parks had previously said she objected to the debate because it was going to be moderated by a Strickland supporter, Rick Lemmo. Parks had challenged Strickland to a verbal duel on three conditions, that it be free, in the district, and televised--leaving the choice of moderator in the Strickland's hands.

This apparent last-minute change [or was it announced Wednesday--see Update at bottom], announced just moments ago in an email by Strickland spokesman Chris Collier, stated:

Linda Parks has not yet confirmed her attendance- because this debate meets all of her requirements issued in her recent challenge to debate, we would expect her to keep her promise and attend.   Should Linda Parks break her promise and choose not to attend the debate, Mrs. Strickland will still attend.

Since the Strickland campaign announced the debate details two weeks ago, both sides have accused each other of stacking the debate deck or chickening out of the debate.

With this new moderator, Parks will have a difficult time arguing he's biased in favor of Strickland. [Update: It should have been noted in the original article that Dr. Gooch ran against Parks several years ago.] Dr. Gooch is a widely respected professor and veteran moderator. However, it is fair of Parks to complain of the sudden change in plans.

Despite the change in moderator, Parks will still be at a disadvantage if she attends. Strickland's campaign has had two weeks to line up supporters to fill the Thousand Oaks City Hall, where the debate will be held. If Parks didn't anticipate this sudden change in plans, she likely has not had enough time to mobilize supporters for tonight's debate. [continue reading]

 [Update, 2:00 p.m: A source close to the Thousand Oaks Boulevard Association, the sponsors of the debate, said that TOBA made the announcement to the Star either Wednesday or Thursday that the moderator would be changed because they want the debate to move forward with both candidates]

Tea Partiers head to Arizona for buycott

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 


A couple dozen Tea Partiers, including Carla Bonney, will head to Arizona for Memorial Day to participate in a "buycott" and show their solidarity with sane immigration policy and states' rights.

As honest people know, when you have the facts, your opponents have no choice but to resort to ad hominem attacks, distractions, and attempts to silence them.

So Tea Partiers are called racist when they support a law that does little more than reaffirm existing federal laws--laws that are being willfully ignored--by people who haven't even read it.

However, race has nothing to do with it--it's a matter of the rule of law. The Democratic Party, which expects millions of illegal immigrants and their families to be future Democratic voters, and the Republican Party, which historically has been scared to death to do anything about the porous border because they don't want to be called racists, have let the problem fester and it's already permanently transformed the country for the worse.

This week, the U.S. Government released a warning that terrorists may be attempting to sneak across the southern border. Anyone with common sense knew that this was a possibility years ago, Factor in the drugs and some hardened criminals crossing the border, and you have a public policy problem of epic proportions.

It manifests itself in right here in Ventura County, where gangs have taken over neighborhoods and shootings or stabbings are daily headlines.

We have out-of-control political correctness and people that are too willing to play the race card to attempt to shut down any attempt to solve the problem to partially blame for the violence, drugs, and social upheaval we're experiencing.

Send tips with VCStar's iPhone app

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 
I just installed the Ventura County Star's free iPhone app, and so far it looks pretty good. Users can browse a mostly text version of the home page, browse by section, or search the archives (but you can't read the blogs, hopefully that feature is coming soon).

My favorite feature is the News Tip section, which provides a button to email a tip or call the newsroom. It will prompt you for your location, so the Star will know exactly where you are when you send it in. It's optional, of course.

That feature would have worked great last night at Elephant Bar in Simi Valley when some guy was tased after being cut off at the bar.

I happened to be at the restaurant at the time, and I could have sent the tip in had I had the app! But I was in a back room and didn't hear the commotion, and I likely would have just written about it in my blog. Interestingly, as I was leaving I saw Sheriff Bob Brooks and Dennis Carpenter off to the side enjoying dinner. No, I didn't interrupt them like a paparazzi. I assume they saw the drunk drug out of the restaurant. Imagine the luck of the guy who decides to make a drunken scene in a restaurant and it turns out it's in front of the county's top cop and his potential replacement.

That reminds me of this story. Of all the people to throw up on at a Phillies game.

Getting back to iPhone apps, check out CitySourced. Like the VCStar's app, it includes a tip line where you can send photos to your city officials if you spot graffiti, potholes, or anything else the city needs to fix. Simi Valley's City Council has expressed interest in it. With graffiti up 500 percent, maybe it can do something to mitigate that.

Dantona stiffed ally's charity in 2009 for $2,500

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 

If you're one of the people that Jim Dantona's stiffed, don't take it personally. You're in good company. Whether you're a friend of his, a car dealership, the county of Ventura, or the state of California, you can take comfort in the fact that Dantona's failed to meet financial obligations to all sorts of groups--even charities.

That's no consolation to Simi Valley City Councilwoman Barbra Williamson--a longtime Dantona ally--who said that late last year Dantona pledged $2,500 to a local charitable fundraiser but failed to pay.

"He made a commitment to me and a non-profit foundation that I work for and he has not fulfilled that financial obligation," said Williamson. "That doesn't sit well with me."

Williamson wouldn't discuss anything else about the charity, except that it services terminally ill patients. I called around and found that a charity that Williamson is associated with had a fundraiser last fall in Simi Valley. I poked around for the fundraiser's invitation, and found that Jim Dantona is listed on it as a $2,500 "reception sponsor."

While Williamson is endorsing Dantona's opponent in the Ventura County Clerk/Recorder race, she did so before Dantona entered the race.

"Had I endorsed him I probably would have pulled my endorsement," she said, noting that she's been friends with Dantona for about 35 years. "If he would do that to a personal friend, I'm wondering what he would do if he wasn't a personal friend."

We already know the answer to that.

Interestingly, Dantona touts his own charitable organization, Baseballers Against Drugs, as one of the main reasons voters should entrust him with a public office that oversees a $9 million budget.

So why didn't he keep his word to donate $2,500 to a charity that helps terminally ill patients? Surely he would have realized that fact would undercut one of his biggest selling points, alienate a longtime ally, and lend further credence to the idea that he's not a man of his word.

But if you're Dantona, you can brush it aside with a mailer that leads with, "Like many Americans today, Jim Dantona has suffered personal and professional hardship, but has fought his way back with grit and determination."

If anyone points out that he also declared bankruptcy in 1992 and 2000, that he failed to make tax payments on time in 2006 and 2008, and has multiple tax liens and court judgments filed against him for refusing to pay his creditors, during times of broad economic prosperity, you can say they are merely digging up "old news because some of the fines dated back years."

If the man suddenly fell on hard times, I think we can give him a pass. But he's demonstrated a life-long pattern of irresponsibility that continues to this present day--voters should think very long before sending him to be the caretaker of our public records and elections.

Obama "sends" legislation to Congress demanding more powers

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 

Hasn't this president rapidly expanded the power of the executive branch enough already? Not even halfway through his first time, President Obama has already basked in the unprecedented concentration of power in that office. Now, he wants more.

President Barack Obama sent legislation to Congress that will give the White House broad authority to reduce wasteful federal spending and block earmarks.

The proposal, called the Reduce Unnecessary Spending Act of 2010, comes amid growing criticism that the federal government's spending is out of control. Such concerns played a hand in a Kentucky primary earlier in the week, where Rand Paul defeated a well-connected Republican state politician by attacking federal spending and deficits.

The legislation allows Mr. Obama to propose a series of rescissions to spending packages approved by Congress. It would have to vote on whether to approve Mr. Obama's rescissions within set time frames to limit debate and without the ability to make any changes.

Somehow, he has spun Kentucky's Tea Party victory into a vehicle to amass more power. The legislation may be a good idea in a vacuum, but given the nationalization of entire industries we've seen in the last 18 months, maybe we can table this one for a little bit.

Just to show how far we've come from the idea of separate but coequal branches, note the language in the excerpt above: "President Obama sent legislation to Congress..."

Yes, I know it's standard operating procedure in recent presidencies for the executive branch to draft legislation, and Congress still gets to vote on it (though expect there to be arm-twisting and possibly a naked Rahm Emanuel sighting. But that's not really how it's supposed to work. Can you imagine the Supreme Court sending legislation to Congress? It's absurd, but how is that different than the executive branch doing it. [continue reading]

Star focuses on unsolved murders

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 

In an exemplary series of articles, the Ventura County Star is focusing on unsolved murders in California. Astonishingly, only about half of our murders are cleared, with random gang violence the driving factor. That's consistent with national trends, as drug-related semi-organized crime replace the more easily solvable crimes of passion.

Compared to years past, when homicides were largely a product of robberies and domestic violence and the suspects were easier to target, police say the increase in gang-related killings has resulted in witnesses reluctant to talk, victims innocently gunned down and killers who walk free for too long. While the overall number of homicides in the county has decreased since the 1990s, the number of gang homicides has increased.

Not surprisingly, many of the homicides occurred in Oxnard (see map below). That's not a reflection of the law enforcement agencies--it's a reflection of the collapse of our borders and rampant illegal immigration.

unsolved homicide map.jpg

Lunn's signs smashed, stolen

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 
Candidate for Clerk/Recorder Mark Lunn posted on Facebook that he's received reports from supporters that his signs were stolen or vandalized:

Thanks for the calls & emails concerning the theft and destruction of my campaign signs. Please know that these unlawful acts were widespread throughout the County-so other than supporting me-you were not individually targeted. For your safety, do not confront anyone who is in the process of destroying/stealing our signs-call your local police agency and be a good witness. I appreciate your continued support!

I decided to check it out for myself, by driving down Los Angeles Ave. in Simi Valley. It took me five minutes to find not just a vandalized Lunn sign, but also a vandalized Peter Foy sign.

Lunn sign.jpg


foy lunn.jpgThe post for Foy's sign is in the foreground. His sign lies nearby, and Lunn's sign is in the upper left corner, and looks like it was squished with a shoe. Someone must really have it in for both men to risk the consequences of getting caught.

Two years ago, two people were arrested for stealing Elton Gallegly signs in Simi Valley, also on L.A. Avenue.

Some signs were apparently stolen from Lunn's supporters' yards. How creepy is it that someone would come into your yard and take something in the middle of the night.


Strickland: Parks backs away from debate challenge

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 

The standoff between Supervisor Linda Parks and Assemblywoman Audra Strickland continues, as multiple opportunities to debate have fallen by the wayside.

The most recent chance to debate would have been May 28th, the date set by Strickland in response to Parks' debate challenge:

The two-term incumbent asked Strickland to name a date she would be available, saying her only conditions are that the event be in the district, free to the public and taped for broadcast.

On Friday, Strickland's team released this:

Meeting all of Parks' challenge parameters, the debate will be held at Thousand Oaks City Hall and will be hosted by the Thousand Oaks Boulevard Association (TOBA).  Rick Lemmo, President of TOBA, will moderate the debate.  The debate will be taped and made available on Time Warner Cable Video On Demand Channel 1 prior to the June 8th primary.

That meets all the requirements for Parks' public challenge.  I wrote this Friday:

I'd expect Parks to agree to the time and location of the debate--it would expose her to criticism if she issued a challenge and then backed down from it.

I attempted to reach the supervisor a few days ago asking what she intended to do about the debate but she hasn't responded as of this writing. However, Strickland's campaign reports that Parks is declining the opportunity, and the Assemblywoman released this statement [continue reading]

Meet CNN's real-life Ron Burgundy

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 

CNN," the most trusted name in news," airs a clown show for two hours in the middle of the day, presided over by Rick Sanchez, who is rapidly becoming an industry joke.

Listed as one of the cable network's Newsroom Anchors, Sanchez doesn't even bother pretending to be objective. His penchant for saying the first thing that comes to mind lands him routinely on Comedy Central's Daily Show, hosted by fellow liberal Jon Stewart.

Just last week, Sanchez read the parenthetical prompter instructions out loud to the camera.

"Up next, ad-lib a tease," the anchorman told viewers before catching himself, conjuring up images of Ron Burgundy telling San Dieg-oans to, well, you've seen the movie.

Earlier this year, Sanchez repeatedly questioned guests on the metric system. "Nine meters in English is....?"

That same day, he pointed to the Galapagos Islands on the map and asked if they were the Hawaiian Islands.


But while Sanchez may be the unintentional clown prince of cable news, there's a darker side to him.

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
The Uninformant!
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full EpisodesPolitical HumorTea Party

In 1990, Sanchez left Miami's Joe Robbie Stadium and ran over a 31-year-old man, leaving him paralyzed in an apparent drunk driving accident. The then WSVN-Channel 7 anchorman denied he was intoxicated. He fled the scene of the accident, and--his story goes--he went home to get his insurance information and then had a couple drinks to calm his nerves before returning to the scene and getting his blood tested.

Sanchez's victim died in 1995 in a Pennsylvania nursing home. Six years later, the anchorman graduated to the big time, going to MSNBC and finally to CNN.

Sanchez was never charged in the man's death.

Parks' debate challenge accepted by Strickland

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 
Audra Strickland's campaign announced Friday afternoon that she's agreed to Supervisor Linda Parks' challenge to debate her and will comply with Parks' conditions that it be free, open to the public, and televised.

Parks criticized Strickland for bowing out of a League of Women Voters candidates forum this week. Strickland responded that she had a scheduling conflict as she was also slated to be at a meet-and-greet at the house of Rick Lemmo, a senior VP of Caruso Affiliated.

Her challenge to Strickland did not specify a place or time, other than it take place before the election. I guess in that respect it's sort of like a duel, where one party issues the challenge and the other party picks the weapon of choice.

In April, a debate sponsored by the Ventura County Young Republicans was aborted because the group failed to meet Parks' no-charge condition.

In accepting Parks' challenge, Strickland chose to hold the debate on Friday, May 28th at 6:30 p.m. at the Thousand Oaks City Hall. It will be moderated by Lemmo, who is also the president of the Thousand Oaks Boulevard Association, a group of commercial property owners that includes The Lakes.

An unfriendly business climate in the Conejo Valley is the theme of Strickland's, who kicked off her campaign at a vacant storefront on T.O. Boulevard. 

"We do not need to look too far to be reminded of the down economy that exists today," Strickland wrote in a statement to the League of Women Voters, in lieu of her appearance at the forum. "You can drive through any major street in the 2nd District and find many vacant stores and buildings."

I'd expect Parks to agree to the time and location of the debate--it would expose her to criticism if she issued a challenge and then backed down from it. And by giving Strickland the opportunity to set the details, she's put herself at bit of a disadvantage as the backdrop reinforces her opponent's "economy" theme as opposed to her own "open spaces" strength.

Assuming the debate takes place, both sides will try to pack the location with their supporters. Although Parks is a Republican, she's moderate enough to draw Democrats who are eager to stick it to the conservative Strickland, hence her condition that the debate be free and open.

It will be an interesting night.

O'Reilly zeroes in on Oxnard school sex scandal

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 


Fox News superstar Bill O'Reilly featured the Oxnard school sex scandal on his program Thursday afternoon. 


He asked KTLA reporter Lu Parker if the story is real because he heard rumors it was a hoax, but she said five witnesses corroborated the story.

"The powers that be at the school district and at the school," O'Reilly asked. "They're avoiding you, they're avoiding me. Have they issued any statement to you and explained anything?"

Parker responded that the school didn't even notify parents that an investigation was taking place.

With all the gang and drug violence emanating from Oxnard, it's a wonder this gets national attention.

Congressional debate on Tuesday night

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 

The five Congressional candidates seeking to replace Lois Capps in the 23rd District are facing off in a debate tonight in Camarillo. Yours truly is the moderator; I've been poring over questions submitted by voters and I can tell you it's going to be an enlightening night.

The debate is organized by the Ventura County Tea Party and cosponsored by the Ventura County Republican Party and the Ventura County Young Republicans.

Click here for more information.

Bloomberg surprised that terrorist wasn't a Tea Partier

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 

The opponents to the Tea Party movement are busy setting up the grassroots protesters as angry, potential homegrown terrorists like Timothy McVeigh, so it's no surprise that New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg assumed that the Times Square Bomber could be someone "that doesn't like the health care bill."

Bloomberg later told CBS Evening News Anchor Katie Couric that the suspect behind the bombing attempt could be a domestic terrorist angry at the government who acted alone.

"If I had to guess 25 cents, this would be exactly that. Homegrown, or maybe a mentally deranged person, or somebody with a political agenda that doesn't like the health care bill or something. It could be anything," he said.

It turned out to be a young, Islamic-extremist immigrant.

You don't say.

Why is it that Progressives ignore the danger posed by Islamic extremists, despite hundreds of examples of attempted or executed terrorist attacks by them over the last few decades, but they jump to conclusions that Tea Partiers, who have turned out in the millions to protest government expansion with nary an arrest, are inherently violent?

One reason is that they're drinking their own Kool-Aid. Almost all the high-profile Progressive leaders are on record worrying about Tea Party violence and shaking their fingers at Fox News and talk radio, sending a warning that they'll be blamed if some crazy extremist from the right blows something up. When they heard of the terrorist attack, they immediately assumed that their PR campaign was about to be validated.

In their haste to blame the Right, they overlooked the obvious--that terrorists are almost always young, Islamic-extremists.

While I believe that one day some nut from the right will commit an act of violence--the movement is so large that there has to a few of them amid the millions that take part in it--it's wildly unfair to blame the movement as a whole. Similarly, it's unfair to blame the Islamic religion for Islamic extremism.

But we shouldn't cast aside common sense either and pretend that most terrorism isn't committed by Islamic extremists.

Three local groups unite to sponsor Congressional debate next week

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 

The Ventura County Republican Party, the Ventura County Tea Party, and the Ventura County Young Republicans will sponsor a debate for the five Republican Congressional candidates running in the 23rd District. The winner of next month's primary will take on incumbent Lois Capps.

Capps, in defending Obamacare, infamously said that the Constitution guarantees "health, liberty and happiness."

I think it's fantastic that different groups are coming to work together toward a common goal, and I'm proud to be the moderator. Each of the aforementioned groups brings a unique advantage to the table.

The GOP brings organization, money, and experience in defeating the Progressives. The Tea Party brings energy, enthusiasm, and populism. The Young Republicans bring the leaders of tomorrow.

The debate will be held Tuesday, May 11th, and costs $15 at the door. For location and time, click here.

I'll see you there!

Dantona's tax problems revealed, Star endorses Lunn

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 

It's a bad week for Jim Dantona, who is running for County Clerk-Recorder against retired CHP Assistant Chief Mark Lunn.

On Sunday, the Ventura County Star endorsed Lunn. Perhaps they knew about Dantona's tax problems. Lunn's campaign posted a document on its website that shows Dantona failed to pay $10,000 in taxes on two homes in Simi Valley. The website reports:

The taxes remained unpaid until April 26th. On that day Dantona, who had ignored repeated demands for payment, delivered a check for the taxes and penalties -- just four hours after a phone inquiry from the Lunn campaign confirmed that the taxes were delinquent.

The website also posted documents showing a variety of liens against Dantona, including a 1997 federal tax lien of $124,902. The most recent lien was in 2005 by the Ford Motor Credit Company.  And I don't even want to know what "Forcible Entry/Detainer" entails on page 3 of the lien summary.

Dantona also declared bankruptcy in 1992 and 2000. 

There's some debate to whether Dantona's financial difficulties should be mentioned during a campaign--but c'mon, do you want this guy in charge of your elections and vital records?

Gorell campaign releases "tested" spot

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 



The Gorell campaign released a YouTube spot Sunday entitled "Tested", meant to tout the "tough-as-nails" side of the 37th Assembly candidate.

Gorell's been a legislative aide, prosecutor, war veteran, and university professor in his career. The 60-second ad focuses on his prosecutorial experience and his stint in Afghanistan, and pronounces him "tested" to take on Sacramento.

Gorell's mentioned in the past that when he used to go along on drug busts as a prosecutor, for some reason the drug dealers would inevitably have a Scarface poster on the wall and copious amounts of pornography strewn about. [continue reading]

IngeMusings
Topic
This blog attempts to add perspective and context to local and national politics, through a variety of disciplines, such as history, economics, and philosophy--all tempered with common sense. About the author

Eric Ingemunson's commentary has been featured on Hannity, CNN, NBC, Inside Edition, and KFI's The John and Ken Show. Eric was born and raised in Ventura County and currently resides in Moorpark. He earned a master's degree in Public Policy and Administration from California Lutheran University. As a conservative, Eric supports smaller government, less taxation, more individual freedom, the rule of law, and a strict adherence to the Constitution.
  • InsofsFrese: A familiar comprar viagra would belly miss your horror man's read more
  • IGTWCWXUvf: zolpidem 10 mg ambien 4 years - ambien in early read more
  • TVrSnLpnKS: buy diazepam buy valium 90 pills - valium like drugs read more
  • ELEYPoqUCY: redirected valium for travel anxiety - purchase valium overnight read more
  • longchamp shoes chicago: Yes! Finally something about %keyword1%. read more
  • christianlouboutinoutletuk: I was recommended this web site by my cousin. I'm read more
  • longchamp pliage l: I used to be recommended this blog via my cousin. read more
  • christianlouboutinpliable: I'm pretty pleased to uncover this web site. I wanted read more
  • ceinture longchamp homme: Hmm is anyone else encountering problems with the pictures on read more
  • viagra: soin visage soin visage soin visage soin visage read more