Recently in Laffer Curve Category

A liberal's guide to the Laffer Curve

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 

Rep. Jan Schakowsky wants to raise taxes to solve the deficit problem. 

This is how a tax-and-spend liberal's mind works. Let's say a liberal is a small business owner (yes, I know it's a stretch, but play along). The business has $2 million in annual revenue, derived from sales of 200,000 widgets that each are priced at $10. But it also has $3 million in annual expenses, for a deficit of $1 million. How does the liberal plan to come up with the extra mil? By raising the price of each widget by $5, or 50 percent! On paper, that's 200,000 units at 5 bucks each, for an even mil. Problem solved.

Let's say people don't want to pay $15 for a widget that cost $10 last year, and 50 percent of them decide they don't need a widget or they buy them somewhere else.

Now her sales are 100,000 widgets at $15, or $1.5 million. She's lost half-a-million dollars in revenue.

When businesses need to make money, they lower prices to encourage economic activity. Have you ever heard of a coupon, Rep. Schakowsky? 

All the time businesses are cutting prices in the hopes it will result in more sales. Governments are no different--by cutting taxes, you can increase the revenue to the government, and cut deficits.

Or, like the widget company, you can repeat the same mistakes Democrats (and sometimes Republicans) make by raising "prices" and watching economic activity plummet.

And no, Schakowsky doesn't want to just increase widgets by 50 percent. She wants to raise cap gains taxes from 15 percent to 28 percent. That's almost a 100 percent hike!

The name of this economic principle is the Laffer Curve.  It states that if you raise taxes past a certain point, you will get less revenue. If you lower taxes past that point, you will get more revenue.

Liberals don't believe in this principle. But try this exercise.

Democrat on deficit commission proposes taxes, spending

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar
 

"Tax-and-spend liberal" is an insult to Democrats in the political arena, but hey-- if it taxes like a liberal, and spends like a liberal, then it must be a tax-and-spend liberal. But some liberals should earn a special designation.

Taxing and spending is one thing when the economy is booming. It's still foolish economically, but at least during those times it's not prescribed as a solution to the debt.

But to propose taxing and spending to get us out of a recession? That's hard core.

The credit goes to Rep. Jan Shakowsky of the Chicago area. While she proposed cutting $143 billion in spending, mostly on defense, she also would also spend $200 billion in new spending "investments". According to Politico:

The money would go to states to avoid tax increases or spending cuts, to build infrastructure, and continue unemployment benefits. Schakowsky proposes the new spending as an addendum to her deficit-cutting.

 She wants to "invest" in a bailout to the states, so they can continue wasting money on unemployment and other social programs.

At the same time, she'd raise taxes on bonds and capital gains, and establish a cap-and-trade program. Schakowsky says she'd reduce the budget by $427 billion in 2015.

This is how a tax-and-spend liberal's mind works. Let's say a liberal is a small business owner (yes, I know it's a stretch, but play along). The business has $2 million in annual revenue, derived from sales of 200,000 widgets that each are priced at $10. But it also has $3 million in annual expenses, for a deficit of $1 million. How does the liberal plan to come up with the extra mil? By raising the price of each widget by $5, or 50 percent! On paper, that's 200,000 units at 5 bucks each, for an even mil. Problem solved.

Let's say people don't want to pay $15 for a widget that cost $10 last year, and 50 percent of them decide they don't need a widget or they buy them somewhere else.

Now her sales are 100,000 widgets at $15, or $1.5 million. She's lost half-a-million dollars in revenue.

When businesses need to make money, they lower prices to encourage economic activity. Have you ever heard of a coupon, Rep. Schakowsky? At this point, a lesson on the Laffer Curve is in order. Read up on it here.

Incidentally, I interviewed the Republican opponent she defeated a couple of weeks ago--he's the Harvard student that dared to question Barney Frank about his role in the nation's financial meltdown. Read it here.

IngeMusings
Topic
This blog attempts to add perspective and context to local and national politics, through a variety of disciplines, such as history, economics, and philosophy--all tempered with common sense. About the author

Eric Ingemunson's commentary has been featured on Hannity, CNN, NBC, Inside Edition, and KFI's The John and Ken Show. Eric was born and raised in Ventura County and currently resides in Moorpark. He earned a master's degree in Public Policy and Administration from California Lutheran University. As a conservative, Eric supports smaller government, less taxation, more individual freedom, the rule of law, and a strict adherence to the Constitution.
  • InsofsFrese: A familiar comprar viagra would belly miss your horror man's read more
  • IGTWCWXUvf: zolpidem 10 mg ambien 4 years - ambien in early read more
  • TVrSnLpnKS: buy diazepam buy valium 90 pills - valium like drugs read more
  • ELEYPoqUCY: redirected valium for travel anxiety - purchase valium overnight read more
  • longchamp shoes chicago: Yes! Finally something about %keyword1%. read more
  • christianlouboutinoutletuk: I was recommended this web site by my cousin. I'm read more
  • longchamp pliage l: I used to be recommended this blog via my cousin. read more
  • christianlouboutinpliable: I'm pretty pleased to uncover this web site. I wanted read more
  • ceinture longchamp homme: Hmm is anyone else encountering problems with the pictures on read more
  • viagra: soin visage soin visage soin visage soin visage read more