Home › Blogs › No Issues Left Behind
« Iceberg....RIGHT AHEAD! | Main | Thanks! »
December 21, 2005
Operation $14,000
"Per pupil funding" is an overused and inconsistent milestone that various special interests use to justify their position that funding is either sufficient or insufficient.
Estimates range from $6500 to almost $10,000 in California's per pupil funding depending on who you ask. The conventional wisdom is if you exclude Title 1, and building construction costs, per pupil funding in California is between $6000 & $7000 per student.
Many pundits today are talking about HUGE bond issues coming next year from the Governor and Legislature, that will vastly increase infrastructure investments. With tax revenues also going up with school enrollments flattening, experts expect per pupil funding to go up.
SO - where do we go from here? Can we increase per pupil funding dramatically to increase educational resources?
Can California step up and eliminate the waste and inefficiences to wring out every necessary dollar?
Can county school agencies take up more of the administrative slack (although they already do a lot) to cut adminstrative costs?
How can we increase the arts, school supply budgets and teacher quality initiatives?
How can we get politics out, be less adversarial and more about the kids?
Do students deserve an educational Bill of Rights?
As we progress towards the new year, I welcome your thoughts.
Merry Christmas & Happy New Year...
Tim Keaney
Comments
If there was suddenly $1000 more funding per student, what would / should the money go for?
Jerre
Posted by: Jerre Reimers at December 21, 2005 04:51 PMArleigh:
I would look up that word at my school library, except I don't have one.
Jerre - legit question. I would like to see expanded music, arts and languages in the elementary schools. I'd also advocate for more middle school intervention programs, reducing the size of middle school campuses...
Anyone?
T
Posted by: Tim Keaney at December 21, 2005 08:57 PMYEAH! Language and arts at the middle and elementary schools! Taking a foreign language at a younger age makes more sense anyway and it helps with connections with mostly all other subjects later on! I agree, as a French teacher!
Posted by: Julie at December 21, 2005 09:17 PMTim:
I'm intrgiued with the the comment of an educational bill of rights. What would you include on the list?
Would you actually support putting this bill of rights into the state constitution?
Scott
Posted by: Scott Blough at December 30, 2005 09:58 AM

Tim,
Posted by: Arleigh Kidd at December 21, 2005 04:21 PMWhat is "puoil"? Anyway, another recent study, published in the Star, said California is 44th in per pupil funding. Also that we are $500 per pupil under the national average. The means if Simi was at the national average we would have $10,000,000 more a year to fix the problems you speak of.