Home › Blogs › No Issues Left Behind
« This is a must read... | Main | Survey Says!? »
January 11, 2006
Wonder why kids can't read?
Legislators go to Sacramento with the best of intentions. They have issues they want to address, to make the state a better place to live for them, and future generations.
Right?
And then we the citizens give them unlimited budgets, ability to write ad nauseum legislation etc...
So of course, should we be surprised when we get something like AB606? What is AB606 you wonder? -
This bill would require a school district to establish and
publicize an antidiscrimination and antiharassment policy that
prohibits discrimination and harassment based on specified
characteristics, including, but not limited to, actual or perceived
gender identify and sexual orientation. The bill would require a
school district to take specified actions related to increasing
awareness of, preventing, and ensuring appropriate responses to,
incidences of discrimination and harassment based on those protected
characteristics. By requiring school districts to perform additional
duties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
---end--- - Click here to read the bill
Any thoughts on this?
1. The name of the bill was changed - which shows the true intent of the bill.
2. Existing law, the California Student Safety and Violence
Prevention Act of 2000, declares that its provisions do not require
the inclusion of specified instructional materials in any program or
activity conducted by an educational institution or postsecondary
educational institution. Existing law declares that its provisions
are not violated by the omission of any specified instructional
material in any program or activity conducted by an educational
institution or postsecondary educational institution.
In other words - districts will now have to post and distribute information about actual or perceived
gender identify and sexual orientation.
So when China, India and other developing nations continue to kick America's competitive BUTT in this information economy - let's all remember the legislation working its way through the California Legislature.
More from the bill...
(b) Pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 201 of the Education
Code, public schools in California have an affirmative obligation to
combat racism, sexism, and other forms of bias, and a responsibility
to provide equal educational opportunity.
(c) The California Student Safety and Violence Prevention Act of
2000 reaffirmed the right of all pupils to a safe school environment
by prohibiting a person from being subjected to discrimination on the
basis of actual and perceived gender identity and sexual orientation
in any program or activity conducted by an educational institution
that receives, or benefits from, state financial assistance or
enrolls pupils who receive state student financial aid.
(d) (1) Studies show that pupils in California continue to
experience discrimination and harassment, and that discrimination and
harassment based on actual and perceived gender identity and sexual
orientation is particularly pervasive.
(2) Many teachers, school staff members, and pupils are unaware of
the rights and obligations regarding discrimination and harassment
set forth in Sections 200, 201, and 220 of the Education Code.
(3) Many teachers and school staff members have not received
effective and comprehensive training to prevent or respond to illegal
discrimination and harassment. This training is particularly lacking
with respect to discrimination and harassment on the basis of actual
and perceived gender identity and sexual orientation.
(4) Many school districts are not effectively addressing
discrimination and harassment on campus, particularly with respect to
discrimination and harassment based on actual and perceived gender
identity and sexual orientation.
(5) Many pupils do not know the manner in which to file a
discrimination or harassment complaint.
(6) Many school districts are responding to complaints about
discrimination and harassment in an inconsistent manner.
Comments
No Scott, that's not what I am saying. What I am saying, is because the state puts these undue reporting and distribution standards on the local districts, districts have to spend money enforcing them. Money that could be better spent in the classroom.
There is already a law on the books that covers this issue - protects the kids, allows for remedies etc... But does not go so far as to tell the districts how exactly they are to handle it.
That is where I object to it.
Tim
Posted by: Tim Keaney at January 12, 2006 04:31 PMTim,
How would a gay student or a student that is straight but that many call gay learn to read?
Would they be able to learn in an environment when a school does not care if they are being called names all day long.
I know you don't think from their perspective, but maybe you should.
I am sorry, but when I see two post in a row that attack teachers for sticking up for ALL students, you come across as uncaring. I wouldn't want that as a teacher.
If a teacher doesn't care, students pick up on that. It won't matter how planned out a lesson is if it is carried out by a robot.
In older entries, you didn't come across as hostile to sticking up for ALL kids. What has changed?
I want the old Keaney back.
Posted by: Ann at January 12, 2006 05:48 PMAnn,
I sincerely appreciate both your comments and your readership. Even more so, I appreciate your posts, even when you disagree with me. Most readers never post.
My point on this post, was to make clear there is already a law on the books that covers and penalizes for this discrimination. Do we really need an additional law, and the associated costs to the districts to do it again?
I don't believe my comments were anti-teacher or student in any way. As you can tell from previous posts this month, where I have covered:
The High School Exit Exam
The NEA and what's happening with dues
Free Public education vs. the Fullerton Laptop Program
I clearly appreciate the value of education, and will continue to advocate for the government to get it right, and in the case of the High School exit exam, applaud it when they do.
Keep reading, and thanks for your post.
Tim
Posted by: Tim Keaney at January 12, 2006 07:34 PMTim:
It appears from the article you listed that districts do not have consistent reporting requirements on harrassment and discrimination reporting.
From above, Staff also has not been given direction "(3) Many teachers and school staff members have not received effective and comprehensive training to prevent or respond to illegal discrimination and harassment. This training is particularly lacking with respect to discrimination and harassment on the basis of actual and perceived gender identity and sexual orientation."
Middle and High School students are very difficult times for students who are going through all sorts of changes. A lot of times, students in the past have been bullied because of their differences.
I think all this amendment is doing is making school districts responsible to understand these differences and the requisite violence, bullying, harrassment that could result from not being proactive.
While I don't agree with all personal lifestyle choices harrasment, bullying, and discrimination in all forms are wrong.
I have no problem with the school system being very proactive in eradicating hate based on personal attributes.
Thoughts???
Scott
Ann:
I don't totally see where Tim is attacking teachers in this article specifically. Can you give me a quote from Tim in the above statement that you feel Tim attacked teachers?
Actually, in the above comments I don't even think Tim used the word teacher.
Scott
Posted by: Scott at January 13, 2006 01:19 PM

Tim:
Are you saying that because school districts must work to end discrimination and harrassment on campus, that kids can't read?
Scott
Posted by: Scott Blough at January 12, 2006 04:06 PM