Home › Blogs › No Issues Left Behind
« Gala Force Winds | Main | From the Daily News »
March 07, 2006
Out of Floods, Hope for Katrina's Kids
From The Associated Press -
New Orleans schools reborn by Katrina
NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (AP) -- The slimy mildew clinging to classroom walls for years, the termite-eaten floors, the paint peeling from school ceilings -- Hurricane Katrina washed all that way.
The storm that destroyed much of this city also devastated the New Orleans public schools.
But that wasn't all bad.
The system, regarded as one of the worst in America, had been rotting for decades: Buildings were neglected. Kids weren't learning. Millions of dollars were squandered or stolen.
Now, six months after Katrina, only a small number of schools has reopened so far, but many people see the storm's destruction as a unique opportunity to rebuild a system that had no place to go but up.
"This is the silver lining in the dark cloud of Katrina," says Sajan George, a turnaround expert who began working at the schools before the storm. "We would not have been able to start with an almost clean slate if Katrina had not happened. So it really does represent an incredible opportunity."
But how does a school system reinvent itself in a city when money is scarce and misery plentiful?
Boldly.
That's what some educators are proposing with a plan that calls for a major shakeup: Schools would be grouped in clusters run by managers. Students would have choices about where they'd attend. And most money and hiring decisions would shift from the superintendent's office to the principals, who are considered more attuned to their schools' needs.
"We have to have a whole new mind-set about how we approach public education," says Scott Cowen, president of Tulane University and head of a mayoral committee that developed the plan. "If we can get our heads around true transformation, we can turn it around."
But change won't come easily.
There's a long history here of squabbling among board members, scandal and academic failure. And that was before Katrina. Now there are new headaches: Thousands of teachers have no jobs. Parents are frustrated with the slow pace of school reopenings. And insiders are openly skeptical of plans for the future.
"I don't think you turn around a failing system by changing the structure of the system," says Ora Watson, interim superintendent of the New Orleans public schools.
Watson also feels not everyone is being heard.
"Some people are being left out of the conversation," she says. "I'm talking about poor people, people who populated the schools, the African-American community."
The Bring New Orleans Back Education Committee that developed the plan says it consulted a diverse group of more than 1,500 people from New Orleans, including teachers, parents and students, along with experts around the nation, and is committed to creating top-quality schools in every neighborhood.
The Orleans Parish school board has endorsed the plan.
Katrina compounded troubles
It has been no secret something had to be done to fix a system so mismanaged that budgets hadn't been balanced in five years, teachers often received inaccurate paychecks and corruption was endemic.
The system was already on the brink of financial collapse when Katrina roared in, severely damaging about a quarter of the schools: Roofs caved in. Fierce winds blew out walls and hurled desks through windows. Floodwaters drowned about 300 buses.
Total losses could reach as high as $1 billion.
Federal dollars will go a long way toward rebuilding, but the schools still face a projected $111 million deficit by June.
And the traditional streams of school dollars -- property and sales taxes -- have shrunken dramatically because some neighborhoods still look like post-apocalyptic burial grounds and many businesses remain shuttered.
Yet schools will be a major barometer of New Orleans' success in luring families back home.
"As long as we don't replicate what we had before, I think schools can be a magnet," in repopulating the city, says Jim Brandt, president of the Public Affairs Research Council of Louisiana, a think tank.
George, a managing director of Alvarez & Marsal, the turnaround firm hired to help the schools, agrees. "There is something symbolic about physically opening a school that encourages people to come back," he says.
It took three months for the first regular public school to reopen. Now, 20 schools are holding classes, with about 9,500 students -- slightly more than 15 percent of some 60,000 enrolled before the storm. Three more schools may open in April.
Some parents grumble that's not enough, but caution makes sense, says Bill Roberti, another Alvarez & Marsal managing director. "Do you rush and open them the way they were," he asks, "or do you take the time and try to fix them?"
Explaining who's in charge of the schools these days requires a scorecard and some background.
Katrina prompted two dramatic changes that have turned the old Orleans Parish school system into a shadow of its former self:
Last fall, the state was given authority to take control of about 90 percent of the city's public schools -- those considered "failing" because they fall below a state average based on test scores, dropout rates and attendance.
A handful of schools had already been taken over before the storm. Now, 112 of 128 that were in the Orleans Parish system are part of a state-administered "school recovery district" and will remain that way for five years.
The second big shift came when some educators -- led by a school board member -- split off 13 schools in the Algiers area on the less-damaged west bank of the Mississippi River and had them designated as charters.
Charter schools have their own boards, so they can design their own schedules and curriculum and choose their own principals and teachers.
After Katrina, chartering schools turned out to be "the most expedient and quickest way to jump start the system," because federal dollars were immediately available for them, says Cecil Picard, the state superintendent of education.
There is no long-range plan to replicate them throughout New Orleans, but some say it's a fresh start.
"It allows you to change one school at a time," says Brian Riedlinger, director of instruction at the Algiers Charter Schools Association.
System plagued by problems
And change clearly is needed in a system where some schools didn't have enough books or even enough toilet paper before Katrina.
Constant turnover at the top didn't help, either. Since 1996, nine temporary or permanent superintendents have run the public schools, according to Picard.
While there were outstanding public schools -- including the state's No. 1 in test scores -- there were many more failures. Even insiders say there were disparities.
"Some schools prospered at the expense of others," says Riedlinger, a 20-year veteran of the New Orleans schools. "We called it the 'haves' and 'have nots.' ... There was never a sense of equity in the school district."
To make matters worse, incompetence and fraud bled the schools of resources.
"The system was just corrupt and terrible from top to the bottom," says Carter Guice, an assistant U.S. attorney. "It was a dog's breakfast of negligence to criminality."
Since 2004, 24 people in the schools, including administrators, teachers and secretaries have been indicted on federal charges such as travel fraud, extortion and taking kickbacks. Fifteen have pleaded guilty.
Questions about financial wrongdoing also surfaced a few years ago when $71 million in federal funds could not be accounted for; an audit turned up most of the money, however, and sloppy record-keeping was blamed.
Then last year, the state hired Alvarez & Marsal. They were stunned by what they found.
"They hadn't done bank records, so nobody could tell you exactly how much cash they had on hand," George says. "Nobody could reconcile the payroll accounts. Nobody could tell you how many employees they had."
The payroll error rate reached as high as 20 percent -- compared with less than 1 percent nationally -- meaning teachers frequently were underpaid or overpaid.
The plan to overhaul the system recommends moving most budget decisions to local schools.
"If you do that, you keep the pool of available money that can be stolen small enough so that it's not really worth going to jail for," says school board member Jimmy Fahrenholtz. "I'm very realistic."
Most people here expect a smaller school system in the years ahead. The state estimates about 28,000 students will be back this fall in about 50 schools.
Educators say turning the schools around will take years, maybe even a generation, and they know many residents -- including those who want to return -- will be looking for signs of progress.
"People are waiting to see, just as they are waiting to see if the levees will be strong enough," says Brandt, the think tank president. "They're waiting to see whether it's a new school system or the same old, same old. People are going to be watching very carefully."
Comments
Tim:
Seems you post positive things about schools and no one responds anymore on this blog. What gives?
Scott
Posted by: Scott Blough at March 8, 2006 09:26 AMScott,
What motivates people to post on particular posts or comments I will never understand. I think when I post about negative things, it gets people riled up because they know it's true, and they little to no control over fixing it, so they post.
When I post about positive things, the same type of rankling doesn't quite exist.
Tim
Posted by: Tim Keaney at March 8, 2006 10:26 AMCourage and hope are not enough. The president of the company I work at is quick to remind the directors and managers that "hope is not a strategy." So true. Call me a skeptic but I will bet that in 5 years, the schools will be no more better of an educational experience than they were in August of 2006.
Let it be known that California is also dependent on the ability of our levees to hold back the water. The downside of the failure of a few levees up north cannot be fully comprehended. Our infrastructure will be intact but will anyone be around to notice? Shortly after the failure of a few levees, salt water will begin to move into the delta area. Fresh water pumps will have to be turned off. The southland will dry up. Job losses will be staggering. Tax revenue for the state will be cut substantially and the government will essentially fail. Then what?
Jerre
Posted by: Jerre Reimers at March 8, 2006 07:13 PMHey Scott, welcome back! Where have you been? One thing we can all agree on is that New Orleans children deserve great public schools as does every child.
Posted by: Arleigh Kidd at March 9, 2006 04:12 PMHi Jerre:
The really cool part about being pessimistic is it gives you the luxury of never being disappointed. Oftentimes, pessimism acts as insulation from further disappointment.
However, the real problem is if everyone was so pessimistic, nothing will ever change and we as a society will become stagnant and unchanging.
Could you imagine at President Kennedy's state of the union when he promised we'd get to the moon and back by the end of the decade, if everyone at NASA and throughout the country just folded their arms and said it would never happen?
Courage and hope is what I believe in the most. I think it is where we disagree the most if you read back in our blog. Sure, I will fail at times, you will fail at times, schools will disappoint at times, problems will arise, but as my Irish grandmother used to say, "Never say Die, say damn."
The real challenge in our society is to pick ourselves up after a defeat, a disappointment, a miscalculation, and believe we can have a better future.
Sure hope is not a strategy, but no strategy was ever born without hope and dogged courage to see it out.
I still believe the people of New Orleans and gulf coast can have a better future than they had prior to the disaster.
I still believe that our public schools can improve in math, science, art, english, history, and civics.
Do you want to know why? We are Americans. We are a hopeful and courageous people capable of the greatest improvements in society and blessed with the greatest system of government, economy, and citizens in the history of the world.
I welcome your thoughts and disagreements as always.
Scott
Posted by: Scott Blough at March 9, 2006 07:11 PMHi Arleigh:
I've been out of town last week and making up for it this week. I had the wonderful opportunity to listen to the experiences of small business bankers. You know, the types that loan to mom and pop shops and entrepreneurs.
Although, this is unrealated, I came away with a deeper respect for small businesses than I ever had before. Essentially, it was argued that the US small business market is the key driver of our democratic institutions.
I've been thinking about this argument for over one week or so and have come away with a stronger commitment to small business and entrepreneurial behavior.
I believe we need to encourage this behavior in public schools and would like to talk to anyone on coming up with more ideas to get students to become small business people, start-up entrepreneurs and hopefully grow their businesses into bigger and stronger businesses.
Do you know any programs in school now that help students prepare to own a business?
Scott
Posted by: Scott Blough at March 9, 2006 07:24 PMScott,
I know a large group that helps students start thier own small biz, sometimes right on campus. Give me a call sometime and I will tell you more.
http://www.ja.org/programs/programs.shtml
Posted by: brian at March 9, 2006 08:39 PMI consider myself to be a realist. Public education these days is not about education, it’s about politics and jobs. I find it hard to believe that anyone feels that our kids are getting a truly great education. If that is pessimistic, so be it. But there are alternatives to public education that I have pointed out where many of the problems that we blog about are resolved. The fact is that I am probably older than the rest of the bloggers and I’ve repeatedly heard promises that were never kept, hence the healthy skepticism.
The problem with being an eternal optimist is that these folks never resolve any problems, because they never see them. It’s interesting that you cite President Kennedy’s State of the Union speech that put us on a path towards getting to the moon (and back). The 60’s were a high point on several fronts. The space race was one of them. Virtually the entire country supported the space program. It was a huge task, yet one that was achieved through the hard work of many people. You don’t find support like that these days. The 60’s were perhaps the high point of public education in California. The schools were highly rated and had general public support. But it was a much different era. Teachers were always right. If I came home with a note from the teacher, my parents made sure that I got my act together. Today, the parents first try to find fault with the teacher, the principal, and the administration. They try to find excuses for their kids rather than face the fact that their little darlings are not making an effort. The student’s lack of achievement is always someone else’s fault. Ask ten teachers if they agree. I, too, believe that our public schools can improve in math, science, art, English, history and civics. But it’s going to take a major shift in realizing where the responsibility lies for the improvement. The responsibility falls to the students and parents, but until the realization hits, there will be no change. We’re still moving in the wrong direction.
The 60’s were also a period of spectacular infrastructure achievements under the governorship of Pat Brown. Again, there was full-scale, public support for that effort. The 60’s were the last time that there was general public support for these things. People were all pretty much pulling in the same direction. Now, everyone has their own agenda. Voters turned down spending money on a peripheral canal years ago, without understanding the severe consequences we face in the event of a handful of levee failures.
So, no, I don’t think things have gotten better in the last 20 years, and I don’t expect that they will get better in the next 10 years. To get out of a hole, first you have to stop digging!
Jerre
Scott,
Good to have you back! I need to talk to you, I'll send you an e mail. With business education I used to always run Junior Achievement in my Social Studies class to teach kids about business and to get them thinking about careers. Business people would come in and teach the course. Eric Anders who started and owns Wood Ranch Bar B Q was one of my business people. He is a great guy and taught the kids a lot about starting a business. We need more of this kind of program.


Tim:
This is just another example of courage and hope in the rebuilding efforts. I think the best is yet to come to a region that has faced such tough times.
Scott
Posted by: Scott Blough at March 7, 2006 02:48 PM