Login | Member Center | Contact Us | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Subscribe to the paper

HomeBlogsNo Issues Left Behind

« Are two Dunns better than one? |  Main  | Can you hear me now? »

April 24, 2006

DEEP impact

What impact will this trend have on schools? Here is the Star Editorial and the Story that spawned it

--Star Editorial---

Editorial: Americans on the move again
The 'exurbs' are the destination

April 24, 2006

Over the decades, Americans moved from farms and small towns to the big cities, then from the cities to the suburbs and now, in a continuing trend reaffirmed by the latest Census, to the "exurbs."

From 2000 to 2004, 18 of the 25 largest metropolitan areas had more people move out than move in. There were some discrete factors — the high-tech bust contributed to the exodus from San Francisco and Boston — but the common denominator was people seeking jobs and, especially, more affordable housing.

Residents leaving high-priced Los Angeles region helped neighboring Riverside metastasize into the nation's 15th-largest metropolitan area and the biggest winner in the 2000-2004 migration sweepstakes.

Riverside added 23 new residents per 1,000 of its population. The biggest loser was the San Francisco area, with 14.7 of every 1,000 departing.

In contrast to the urban white flight of earlier years, this move out of the big cities cuts across racial, ethnic and economic lines. People are moving to distant suburbs and small cities on the periphery, the exurbs.

Increasingly, that's where the jobs are, and if traffic planners don't have enough problems, they must contend with growing suburb-to-suburb and exurb-to-exurb commuting.

The long-term migration from the Northeast and Midwest to the Sun Belt continues. Florida, Arizona, Nevada, Georgia and North Carolina were the big gainers; Ohio, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Illinois, California — a victim of its own success — and New York the big losers.

Americans have always been willing to pack up and move in search of a better life. They still are, and that's why sprawl — suburban and exurban — is becoming a way of life.

Population's flight fueled by high cost of housing
New U.S. Census figures show county's losing its middle class

By Charles Levin, clevin@VenturaCountyStar.com
April 22, 2006

With two kids and another on the way, Yesenia Rodriguez and her husband needed a bigger house but couldn't afford one in Ventura County.

So in August, they sold their three-bedroom home in El Rio for $505,000 and bought a six-bedroom house with a swimming pool in Bakersfield for $415,000.

They aren't alone. Newly released numbers from the U.S. Census Bureau show that more people continue to leave Ventura County than arrive here from other counties, a trend that could bode ill for businesses and schools. The numbers, however, don't include people coming here from other nations or residents moving abroad.

Census data released this week estimated that 10,642 more people left Ventura County than arrived from other counties from July 1, 2004, to June 30, 2005 — more than double its estimate of 4,700 for the previous fiscal year.

Five years ago, the numbers were on the plus side, with 1,212 more people migrating to Ventura County than leaving.

Not all the details are clear

The latest census report doesn't provide figures on exactly where people here are flocking to, or the origins of those moving here. And when immigration from other nations is taken into account, the county's population dropped by only 59 people last fiscal year, from 796,165 to 796,106, according to the Census Bureau.

The state has a different formula for measuring population and "net domestic migration," and its figures are not as severe. The state's net migration figure for 2004-05 in Ventura County was 4,270, but, it said, overall population rose by 7,103, to 815,528.

Still, it's the mostly young, educated, middle-income families like the Rodriguezes who are fleeing, driven away by housing costs, experts say. Most leave for Bakersfield or the Inland Empire counties of Riverside and San Bernardino, previous population reports have shown.

This week's figures didn't surprise several experts, but one said the numbers show the trend is accelerating.

"This certainly is a dramatic change in the pattern," Bill Fulton, a planning expert and Ventura councilman, said this week. "It suggests to me that if we want to keep young, middle-class families, we have to have houses for them to live in and jobs for them to work at."

Fulton attended a regional growth conference this week called "Where Will the Children Live?"

"The trend suggests somewhere else," he said.

Housing costs continue to rise partly because retirees and aging baby boomers from Santa Barbara and Los Angeles counties have enough money to outbid local residents seeking to buy here, said economist Bill Watkins, director of the University of California, Santa Barbara, Economic Forecast Project.

Median housing cost $610,000

In March, the median price for new and existing homes and condominiums in Ventura County was $610,000. The median is the point at which half the homes cost more and half cost less.

Meanwhile, Ventura County retirees and families are leaving, selling their homes and taking their equity to communities where real estate is cheap, Watkins said.

Left unchecked, the trend will leave Ventura County with a two-tiered economy of haves and have-nots: affluent empty-nesters with disposable income and working-class families who perform service jobs and live in overcrowded conditions, Fulton said.

Businesses will suffer as the county continues to lose its "brain trust" of young, educated workers, said Zoe Taylor, president and CEO of the Ventura Chamber of Commerce.

School officials have watched the trend for years, and the latest numbers only reinforce their observations, said Chuck Weis, Ventura County Superintendent of Schools.

"Last year we lost 331 students countywide," Weis said this week. "This year, we think we're down about 1,500 students — maybe higher."

As enrollments decline, schools lose state funding, which threatens programs like art, sports and music, and school jobs from custodians to teachers. School closures are inevitable, Weis said.

Schools losing students

For several years, Ojai and Oak Park schools had suffered the biggest attendance losses. But enrollments in 15 of the county's 20 districts are now declining, Weis said.

When Rodriguez moved to Bakersfield, local schools lost both a student — one of her children — and a teacher. Rodriguez was teaching at McKinna School in Oxnard and didn't want to leave her job, colleagues or seven brothers and sisters.

But the couple dreamed of nice vacations and a second home for rental income. Husband Marco, who sold cars for a local dealership, hoped to open his own business.

That wasn't likely to happen with a $2,100-a-month mortgage in El Rio, said Yesenia Rodriguez, 29. "We were making it, but we were living on a budget," she said.

In Bakersfield, Marco, also 29, recently opened a cellular phone store. Some months are slow, but the couple's mortgage payments are now only $1,200 a month, so they can make it on Yesenia's teacher salary.

"We wouldn't ever be able to do that in Oxnard or purchase a home like what we have now in Oxnard," she said.

The Ventura Chamber of Commerce will soon convene a focus group, including city officials, business leaders, seniors, environmentalists and neighborhood activists, to brainstorm the housing problem, Taylor said.

Home prices, however, will continue climbing as retiring baby boomers want to live in coastal California, Watkins said.

Housing prices could flatten or even fall like in the 1980s and 1990s, but that's hard to predict, Fulton said.

"We're hostage to certain economic and social forces," Fulton said. "You can do as much as you can to make a marginal difference — provide more housing for the middle class — but it's definitely an uphill battle."




Comments

Tim,
I've said it many times that I would like to see more entry level housing built in Simi and in Ventura County. I think it is very unhealthy for a community to not be able to retain their young people and to not be affordable for workers of all kinds. I just read that Target may take over the Kmart site, do we need another Target? How about some entry level housing on that site, or maybe mixed use residential/commercial?

Posted by: Arleigh Kidd at April 24, 2006 02:13 PM

I not sure that it is possible to build our way out of this problem. Building is one solution, but without an equal number of jobs all that happens is people buy one place and commute to their job in another place. Our local politicians continue to do an excellent job of pushing good paying existing job to other areas. Many of the high-skill, high-paying manufacturing jobs are gone. Automotive production ceased to exist years ago and now airplane production has come to an end.

But I guess what is more important, and something that we actually have control over, is how we react to a declining student population. And that is in the hands of the school board. The Board should be very well aware of the decline in student population. The Board needs to make decisions now on how they are going to deal with this, not five years from now, when the number of options is limited. The Board is controlled by the teachers’ union (without the union endorsement and campaign contributions, you don't get elected). Let’s see what ideas they all come up with to address this problem. It’s not going away, that’s for sure.

Posted by: Jerre Reimers at April 25, 2006 08:25 AM

Jerre,
If you really believe the Board is "controlled" by the teachers Union you are a fool! Please call all five Simi Board members and ask them if they are "controlled" by the Union. Then report back here on the blog what they said. Then call everyone of the City Council and ask them if they are "controlled" by developers. This is what I was talking about Tim, hard to have a debate when people like Jerre spout right wing rhetoric that has no basis in fact. Jerre, you are not on the Board and it is not the fault of the Union, it was your campaign. Steve Gould was elected to the Board and he did not receive the unions recommendation, same with Norm Walker and same as many others. Also, in this past Board Election the one's who won were not the one's who spent the most money.

Posted by: Arleigh Kidd at April 25, 2006 10:25 AM

Yeah Arleigh,

But all three union-endorsed candidates won the election. Because of this, you cannot imply that the endorsement had no effect on the outcome.

Union "control" of the Board would become transparent in Board votes. I can't say that I've observed Board votes that entirely favor the union(s).

If you ask any politician if he or she is "controlled" by anyone (other than maybe their spouse), you're the fool if you actually think they are ever going to admit anything. Just posing the question is likely to bring the phone call to an abrupt end.

Posted by: Alan at April 25, 2006 11:08 AM

Is there anyone on the current Board in Simi who was not endorsed by the union?

But back to the question – what is this Board going to do about declining enrollment? How does the union fell it should be dealt with?

Posted by: Jerre Reimers at April 25, 2006 02:17 PM

Alan,
Is there anyone on the Simi City Council (except Michelle Foster) who has not received money from developers? Does this mean they are controlled by them and that you cannot win unless they give you funding? Norm Walker won two terms without the unions funding or endorsement, but sometimes Norm voted for things the Association wanted like a pay raise, some members we have recommended voted against things the Association wanted. My point here is that Jerre has put into the debate something without merit or with a point. Jerre wants to say what does the union think because that is what the Board will say and I say that is a load of crap! I have no idea what the Board is going to do with declining enrollment, call them and ask them or go to a meeting and ask. The Association has no opinion on the topic as far as I know. My opinion is to build more entry level housing in Simi, start with the Kmart site.

Posted by: Arleigh Kidd at April 25, 2006 02:33 PM

Jerre Reimers: The voters keep voting for Unin backed candidates. Does that mean that really, it is the voters fault?

Posted by: Nelson Mandela at April 25, 2006 05:36 PM

Sorry, I don't answer comments from unidentified people.

Posted by: Jerre Reimers at April 26, 2006 12:02 PM

Oh, I read this morning that T.O. parents have to pay $10 each for tickets to the graduation ceremony. What an innovative fund-raising idea. Next up -- $10 for each and every non-classroom activity.

Posted by: Jerre Reimers at April 26, 2006 12:58 PM

Tim,
You'll love this one. Cathy C. has been posting on the Star everytime someone writes a letter against Mike Dunn, blaming me. Somehow she believes I am at fault for his activities and at fault for people I do not know, and have never met, writing letters to the editor about Mr. Dunn. She does not like it when anyone exercises their freedom of speech, unless, it conforms to her narrow, extremist, view. She is also claiming I used "profanity" on you blog when I used the vile word "crap" above. Of course, the word crap came from Mr. Crapper. His name used to appear on toilets and people would say they were going to the "Crapper". From that, the word "crap" was born and used like the word "bull" or "bunk". Now if Cathy wants to talk about profanity I would say she should give her opinion on when President Bush said back in 2000 "There is that reporter. He is a first class a**hole". Or when Vice-President Dick Cheney said to Patrick Leahy on the floor of the U.S. Senate "Go F**k Yourself". Now that is profanity! In terms of Cathy it is flattering how obsessed she has become with me. I'm even starting to wonder if maybe she has a little bit of a crush on me or something. But to get back on topic, I do think declining enrollment is a big issue. Over 50% of the Districts are facing this problem. I worry about the impact on good educational programs it is having.

Posted by: Arleigh Kidd at April 27, 2006 10:14 AM

Hey Arleigh!
Nobody cares about the origin of your thought processes! Mr. Crapper is probably rolling over in his grave.

Posted by: Dick Cheney at April 27, 2006 09:03 PM

Hey Dick Cheney, you're a coward for not putting you're real name!

Posted by: Arleigh Kidd at April 28, 2006 11:38 AM
Post a comment






Remember personal info?






Sponsored Links