Login | Member Center | Contact Us | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Subscribe to the paper

HomeBlogsNo Issues Left Behind

« Teachers, what's in your wallet? II |  Main  | Come on home »

April 27, 2006

From the Sac Bee

Great comments today from Dan Weintraub...

PPIC Poll (careful - PDF format)

PPIC has a new poll out today that focuses on education, and shows that voters are still down on the schools and the governor's handling of the issue. Overall, his approval rating is a respectable 46-44 among likely voters. But only 33 percent approve of the way he has handled the education issue. No doubt still a residue of his "broken promise," even though his current budget proposal would bring the schools' ongoing funding base back to the level it would have been if he had funded them the way the education lobby thought he should have.

Voters say they would be happy to raise taxes for schools -- as long as somebody else pays them. Upper income? Sure. Sales or property taxes, not so much.

The poll also checks in on the Democratic primary and finds Westly ahead of Angelides, 26-20, and by an even greater margin (29-20) among voters most concerned about the public schools. In other words, Democrats say they would love to raise taxes on the rich to increase funding for schools, but they prefer the candidate who says he doesn't want to do that over the one who does. Go figure.


Comments

The poll said they trust their local teachers, school boards and principals, but not the governor or government in general.

Posted by: Arleigh Kidd at April 27, 2006 03:54 PM

Thank God (can I say God when talking about the public schools?), in a few months we will have a Democratic governor and legislature and all will be well with public education.

Posted by: Jerre Reimers at April 28, 2006 02:58 PM

Jerre,
At least when they make a deal to fund schools they will not break their promise to kids like Arnold did.

Posted by: Arleigh Kidd at April 28, 2006 03:21 PM

One thought is that in poll results like this, people always fell that the local school district is great but all those other districts are not so great. How can it be that if the individual districts are all rated great by the locals that collectively the state does a poor job with education? Individuals are almost compelled to judge their own district great or they would have to rationalize to themselves why they are putting their own kids in the local schools. It’s easy for them to say that the next district down the road is not so great because their kids do not attend there.

Hence the poll results.

Posted by: Jerre Reimers at April 29, 2006 07:04 PM
Post a comment






Remember personal info?






Sponsored Links