Home › Blogs › No Issues Left Behind
« Roy works at the bad analogy department | Main | Did your VC school apply? »
July 24, 2006
Can you name the source?
We hear it a lot - "Keep the seperation of Church & State". "Keep the bible OUT of the classroom" and "That's what Sunday school is for" - But can you name the source of the following statement?
"Much of the great literature studied today was written in times when the general population was expected to have a firm understanding of the Bible's teachings. Works such as Heart of Darkness, The Grapes of Wrath, Lord of the Flies, and To Kill A Mockingbird are all rife with biblical allusions -- and there are more than 1,300 documented references in Shakespeare alone. Yet, in the decades-long struggle over political correctness and church/state separation, the Bible has been shut out of the public classroom. This breeds a lack of biblical familiarity that can impede a thorough understanding of literature and history and can seriously limit a student's potential for success in high school English. We are raising a generation of students who have not been exposed to the academic value of the Bible and, as a result, are suffering in literature classes and on standardized exams.
Confusion over the constitutionality of teaching the Bible in public schools has scared teachers and lawmakers away from the subject. However, the same 1963 Supreme Court ruling that prevents public schools from requiring devotional use of the Bible also explicitly confirms that academic study of the Bible is indeed constitutional. The distinguishing factor is objectivity: Indoctrination is prohibited, but education ought to be encouraged. "
Is this statement from the neo-cons? Bush? Conservatives looking for prayer in schools or the 10 commandments on the school room wall?
Place your bets...
DLC | Model Initiatives | July 24, 2006
Bible Elective Course

That's right... The DEMOCRATIC Leadership Council....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Dem Play | An objective course studying the Bible's academic and historical influences.
Where It's Working | Over 350 school districts in 37 states
Players | State and local officials
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More Education Plays
Much of the great literature studied today was written in times when the general population was expected to have a firm understanding of the Bible's teachings. Works such as Heart of Darkness, The Grapes of Wrath, Lord of the Flies, and To Kill A Mockingbird are all rife with biblical allusions -- and there are more than 1,300 documented references in Shakespeare alone. Yet, in the decades-long struggle over political correctness and church/state separation, the Bible has been shut out of the public classroom. This breeds a lack of biblical familiarity that can impede a thorough understanding of literature and history and can seriously limit a student's potential for success in high school English. We are raising a generation of students who have not been exposed to the academic value of the Bible and, as a result, are suffering in literature classes and on standardized exams.
Confusion over the constitutionality of teaching the Bible in public schools has scared teachers and lawmakers away from the subject. However, the same 1963 Supreme Court ruling that prevents public schools from requiring devotional use of the Bible also explicitly confirms that academic study of the Bible is indeed constitutional. The distinguishing factor is objectivity: Indoctrination is prohibited, but education ought to be encouraged.
In two Southern states, Democratic legislators are promoting an idea that reconciles constitutional protections with the sound public aim of making sure school children understand this country's religious heritage.
"The history of our country was significantly influenced and intertwined with the Bible. Having a high-quality course enhances teaching and learning, especially the study of literature and history."
-- State Senator Kasim Reed, Georgia
Alabama House Majority Leader Ken Guin (supported by House Speaker Seth Hammett) and Georgia State Sen. Kasim Reed (in conjunction with fellow senators Tim Golden, Doug Stoner, and J.B. Powell) have sponsored legislation authorizing public high schools to teach an elective academic study of the Bible and its influence on art, literature, music, culture, and politics.
Guin and Reed proposed the use of a new text, The Bible and Its Influence, to give teachers and school districts clear guidelines for a nonsectarian, nonreligious academic examination of the Bible in literature, art, and history. The book, a product of the nonpartisan, ecumenical Bible Literacy Project, exposes students to many different interpretations of biblical passages and acknowledges both the positive and negative uses of the Bible throughout history. It is the result of a thorough and intense editing process, having filtered through the hands of 40 reviewers. This group of academics, teachers, and religious scholars worked with the clear goal of producing a strictly objective, educational, and nonreligious book. The text is designed specifically as a student guide and the primary goal of the course is described as "basic biblical literacy -- a grasp of the language, major narratives, symbols, and characters of the Bible."
Legislation authorizing academic study of the Bible in the public high school curriculum is both good policy and good politics. Such legislation will not only provide students with a distinct educational advantage, but will offer Democrats the opportunity to talk to voters about their faith and values.
Resources for Action
Additional Reading
New Dems of the Week: Ken Guin & Kasim Reed
Democrats in 2 Southern States Push Bills on Bible Study
www.bibleliteracy.org/Site/News/bibl_news060127NYT.htm
Public schools looking at Bible literacy class
www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-01-24-bible-elective_x.htm
Contacts
Elizabeth Walker
Office of Representative Ken Guin
Alabama House of Representatives
PO Box 470
Carbon Hill, AL 35549
(334) 353-3090
Comments
Christianity (and other faiths) are intertwined with our cultural history and have shaped the world around us, often for the better and sometimes for the worse. It is silly to think that we can eliminate all religious references in public schools without depriving students of a basic understanding of their own history and culture, and of the dynamics of the world around them. I agree that we should not be indoctrinating children and that discussion of various religions should be done for academic purposes. But the Holy Bible is an incredible historic document that has profoundly shaped western society and should be included with the great literary works of the world.
I also agree with Brian that study of other religions should be included. But again, it should be done in the spirit of academia, not for the purposes of politically-correct equal time.
Posted by: Bubba Kidd at July 25, 2006 08:23 AMAh, BubbaKidd! It amazes me how much we actually AGREE on, as opposed to what we spar about. I've advocated teaching Ethics & Morality in PSs in the past and its obvious such electives would have to include some acquaintance with the historical basis of our traditions. I also can't think of a single friend I know or anyone that I've discussed the issue with who is against teaching religion in public schools, in such an academic context....not a one. I would guess that most voters would share the same experience, though we all have plenty of anecdotal stories that have found their way into the public conciousness. (Note: Notwithstanding the above, I am firmly against teaching Intelligent Design in the science classroom.)
Posted by: gs at July 28, 2006 05:51 PMTim, reveal the source and more on your thoughts.
Posted by: Not Tim Keaney at August 1, 2006 04:53 PM

I think the issue becomes muddled when there is an agenda involved. Most of us would agree that students should have at least a passing familiarity with the Christian Bible and other religious works to be able to discuss history and major themes in works of art.
I would assume that teaching the Koran and the Old Testament would also be included.
Posted by: Brian at July 24, 2006 11:37 PM