ANAHEIM -- The most atypical thing about the start to the Ducks' season is that the home-ice advantage hasn't been one.
"This has been our happy place the last three or four years," noted forward Teemu Selanne. "Our home record this year has been really different."
Even with Monday's 4-1 win over Colorado, the Ducks are just 6-6-2 at the Honda Center, where they've been 80-25-18 (a .724 percentage) over the last three seasons.
If they were similarly mediocre on the road, this might not be that noteworthy. But away from home, they're 6-2-1, and have an active streak of seven straight road games in which they've earned points (6-0-1).
And so, entering Monday's game, there was a growing sense of urgency for the Ducks to correct their home-ice deficiency.
"Time for us to step up and make an impression in our home building," said Ducks coach Randy Carlyle. "We haven't started that well, and you can't have a successful record if you don't start well at home."
The Ducks haven't started well whether you're looking at the overall schedule, or individual games. Before Monday, they'd been outscored 14-13 in the first period at home, and had given up the first goal in six of the 13 games, going 1-5 on those games. (On the road, they've allowed the first goal just twice.)
"At home, a few games we're getting behind the eight ball early and on our heels quick," said forward Corey Perry, "and we're trying to play catch-up the rest of the night.
"Maybe we're just playing our style of game on the road, and when we come home, we have to bring that back and play our grinding style of game."
Agrees Selanne, "I think this year, on the road, we have been more focused on urgency and good starts. At home, we have been a little too loose."
Selanne also offers the theory that the Ducks may have been hurt by, oddly enough, having too many home games, or at least too many at one time.
"I personally believe that if you play more than four games in a row at home, then it's going to be tough," he says. "Because home games, you should get so excited. And you get so many in a row, you get a little flat."
should be you get so excited, and you get so many in a row, you get a little flat."
Anaheim recently concluded a six-game homestand, part of a stretch in which nine of 10 games were at home -- and the other one was in Los Angeles. The Ducks began those nine home games by going 3-0-1, then were 1-3-1.
You'll often hear players say it's easier to concentrate on the task at hand on the road, but Selanne doesn't really think that explains the disparity.
"Yeah, there's no distractions," he said. "But same hand" -- that's not a typo, but a classic Selanne-ism -- "if you look at the record last year, we are .750 at home and .500 on the road. It doesn't sound like there's distractions here."
Beyond that, the Ducks are aware of the issue, but have a hard time saying why it has developed.
"I don't know," said Carlyle. "Obviously, it's our job as coaches to take some responsibility for that. As simple as that. Whatever we choose to do to motivate our players has not been something that has been working on our behalf. We'll have to change it."
The focus entering Monday's game was to change the result by changing the start, and to change that start by building on a series of small goal.
"That's something we were focusing on going in," said Chris Kunitz, "starting with everything first (that is) good -- first hit, first shot, first save, draw the first penalty and all that kind of stuff. That's one of the reasons we kept going the whole game."
The Ducks may not have exactly followed that plan. With Nathan McIver and Colorado's Cody McLeod earning fighting majors just seven seconds into the game, it's hard to say who had the first hit, and while the Ducks had the first power play, it was hard to say they "drew" it, since Colorado was called for too many men on the ice.
But in general, they were the better team from the start, and they certainly were in the way that mattered most, taking a 2-0 lead in the first period on goals by Selanne and Kunitz just 3:20 apart.
Since Colorado had scored just 17 goals in its previous 11 games, that figured to be enough. And it was, particularly since the Ducks sustained the effort, and even improved on it in a second period that saw the control the play and outshoot the Avs 8-4.
"We know the potential we have in this dressing room," said goaltender Jean-Sebastien Giguere, "but I don't think we've reached our potential since the beginning of the year. I don't think there's one game where we can say we played a full 60 minutes that was flawless.
"There's no games that are flawless, but tonight was as close as we could be. The second period, I thought, was our best all year. We controlled the play, spent most of the period in their zone, and when you do that, things are going to go your way."
It is, of course, too early to say the Ducks have solved their home-ice problems. That would take sustained success, which has been elusive so far; the team has won consecutive home games just once.
But if nothing else, Monday's game reinforced their knowledge of the formula for success.
"That's the attitude we have to get to," said Selanne, "to get a good first period. Tied or better after the first, you have a good chance."
Said Carlyle, "It's more of that type of intensity, more of that type of overall play that we're looking for, especially in our building, because we've been able to do that historically here with this group."








Print
