THERE ARE CERTAIN PEOPLE who come into your life that you realize just fit. I met Mary Haffner back in 2000 when our children's school had been covered in a toxic cloud from a pesticide drift from a neighboring orchard, an incident which I've written about a few times here. My daughter and other children became ill.

Enraged, I alerted every media outlet I could find. The story ended up on the front page of the Los Angeles Times.

Enraged, Mary organized parents, held meetings and helped spearhead legislation later carried by then-Assemblymember Hannah-Beth Jackson to stop this from happening again.

Used to operating independently on various activist endeavors, we discovered each other one day with a mutual exclamation of "OK, you were the one who did that. I was wondering."

Three years later Mary called me to co-chair a group she wanted to start to raise money for the Ventura Unified School District. Save Our Schools raised thousands of dollars, sponsored many education rallies and helped bring our highly successful School Resource Officer program back to our campuses.

In 2005 my friend told me she wanted to run for school board here in Ventura and I enthusiastically agreed she would do a fine job. In the past four years she has already been elevated to the position of president. I am proud of her accomplishments and I heartily support her re-election.

The only school board member with children in the district, Mary is a devoted mother of three who manages to do it all and do it all well. An attorney, Mary has also been a strong voice for sustainability and environmental stewardship. As a board member, Mary helped to draft Ventura Unified's Green Schools Resolution -- a statement of Ventura Unified's commitment to sustainability and the promotion of policies and actions that help our district tread more lightly on the earth.

In alignment with this philosophy, Mary serves as the board representative on the Ventura Unified Green Schools Committee and is the Chair of the Ventura County Regional Energy Alliance.

In these tough budget times for our schools, she has shown exemplary leadership. And Ventura schools have weathered this storm better fiscally than most surrounding districts. Our API scores have increased every year since 2002.

But on a more personal note, she has been a wonderful friend. Like any two strong, independent women, we've had our little spats, but we always find our way back to each other because in this life you always need somebody who really understands you.

On Nov. 3, cast your vote for Mary Haffner and by doing so you will also be helping the children of Ventura.

For an interview with Mary on CAPS-TV, go here.

WHEN I WAS A KID growing up in the Midwest, one of our summertime ordeals was the annual very long car trip through the plains states. In South Dakota, the dreary landscape was broken up only by large signs nearly every mile advertising the merits of tourist trap Wall Drug.

Indeed, in South Dakota, Wall Drug signs are as ubiquitous as cornfields are in Iowa.

To a bored kid who had read all her Nancy Drew books and was tired of listening to her little brother ask "Are we there yet?" this Wall Drug sounded rather intriguing. But my dad always drove right through Wall, S.D. without ever stopping.

One summer, after much begging from me, we finally stopped and I ran out of the car with much anticipation to the disappointing discovery that behind all that advertising, Wall Drug just really didn't have that much to offer.

And so it also goes with the campaign signs in Ventura.

As I predicted back in August, the plethora of 15 City Council candidates, five school board candidates and three measures on the Nov. 3 election has brought with it a perfect storm of visual blight to the City of Ventura. It hasn't escaped my attention that the people and measures with the most signs are seeming a bit desperate these days. Sprouting like toadstools, signs are sticking in every tree well and roadside spot in the city.  With every new one planted, three more pop up next to them.

And although it was certainly not the determining factor, it is not by accident that my vote went to the candidates with the LEAST amount of signs this year.

My fellow Star blogger Brian Dennert has a fun game he plays after every election called "Take down that campaign sign." Readers send in photos of those straggling signs still up many weeks later. We may play that game here, too.

I ASKED MY FRIEND Herb Gooch if those signs really influence voters. Gooch is a multi-titled political guru and professor at California Lutheran University in Thousand Oaks and one of the brightest guys I know.

"... Their main value is longer term in reinforcing credibility," Gooch said. "The more neighbors see neighbors putting them up, the more a sense of name ID and ground support is generated. In truth they are most important in their absence -- assuming some opposition uses them, and you have little or nothing, your absence makes the other guy look more credible than you.  But if everyone has them, they don't have altogether much affect."

He added: "A final note: signs are relatives of bumper stickers -- they reinforce a sense that the candidate has support and remind people of name and logo (or at least colors), but don't convince people to vote one way or the other unless they are already predisposed to that way. They are less stimulators or determiners than reinforcers."

So... as long as people think they work, I guess we're stuck with this particular political tool. But like politics in general, it isn't pretty.

IT'S NOT OFTEN you get to spend an afternoon with somebody your children read about in history books, but on Saturday afternoon I got lucky and ended up shooting the breeze with a true American folk hero, Lilly Ledbetter, the inspiration for the first piece of legislation President Barack Obama signed: the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.

Ledbetter was the keynote speaker at the excellent Ventura County Women's Forum held at Cal Lutheran University, of which the National Women's Political Caucus was a sponsor.

Celebrities don't impress me. It's the plain folks who are out getting it done who I find ultimately more fascinating, and in this regard Ledbetter is without peer. With her Southern drawl and quick wit, she's a colorful and articulate voice for pay equity issues.

"You're really something. I hope you never go up against me," Sen. Ted Kennedy once told her.

For 19 years, Ledbetter, now 71, worked grueling 12-hour days and even endured sexual harassment at her job as a supervisor at Goodyear Tire Company in Gadsten, Ala. Then one night in 1998 she received an anonymous note that let her know she was earning far less than men doing comparable work at her plant.

A recipient of a top performance award, she was more organized and diligent than her male counterparts, but nonetheless found herself on the short end of the pay scale.

"I was feeling very degraded, less of an individual with less respect. I never backed down on any job no matter how hard or how dirty," Ledbetter said. And then it dawned on her that her lower wages also affected her overtime pay, Social Security and retirement benefits.

"At that moment I realized for the first time in my life that I was a second-class citizen and would be for the rest of my life. I thought about it and filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission."

After several months, the investigator for the EEOC called and said, "You've got one of the best cases we have ever seen."

LEDBETTER WAS IMMEDIATELY shunned by her co-workers. "Believe you me it was like I had a very serious disease somebody could catch and when I'd meet them in the hall they'd turn and go the other way."

Ledbetter found a lawyer who would take her case pro bono, took early retirement and sued for illegal gender discrimination under the Civil Rights Act. A jury awarded her $360,000 in back pay and damages, but the case was appealed and eventually wound up in the U.S. Supreme Court where she lost in 2006 on a 5-4 decision.

Because the Civil Rights Act imposes a 180-day deadline on most claims, and Ledbetter did not find out about her pay inequity for many years, Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority said that an employee is not entitled to recover for anything that occurs before that cut-off.

"But bless Justice [Ruth] Ginsberg's heart -- the only woman on the court. She said it didn't make sense. These people don't understand what it's like in the real world because people don't stand around the water coolers discussing their pay. ... These cases are very difficult to prove," Ledbetter said.

A bill to amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 stating that the 180-day statute of limitations for filing an equal-pay lawsuit regarding pay discrimination resets with each new discriminatory paycheck passed the House in 2008, but Republicans killed it in the Senate.

More setbacks came for Ledbetter when her husband died of cancer last December. "We'd been battling that all through this. Your life doesn't stop because you've got a lawsuit."

But even while helping her husband fight a serious disease, she never gave up her cause. "The true test of a person is not so much what happens to us but how we react to it. Do we see it and do nothing or do we fight back?" she said.

A favorite of the Obamas, Ledbetter campaigned hard for our new president and after he won, she danced the second dance with him at the Neighborhood Inaugural Ball. That's when she knew her bill was destined to become law.

"He kept telling me during the dance, 'We're going to do this.' And I knew he meant the bill. And he did."

This is Rush Limbaugh's official reaction to the news that our president was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize:

"Our president is a worldwide joke. Folks, do you realize something has happened here that we all agree with the Taliban and Iran about -- and that is he doesn't deserve the award? Now that's hilarious, that I'm on the same side of something with the Taliban."

Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid had of course earlier in the day issued a statement from the usual "undisclosed location" condemning the award. At the same time, U.S.- and NATO-backed Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai called the award "appropriate."

"His hard work and his new vision on global relations, his will and efforts for creating friendly and good relations at global level and global peace make him the appropriate recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize," Karzai's spokesman Siamak Hirai said.

So whose side does Limbaugh take? The guy in the cave. Even Rush addicts must be feeling a little icky now.

William Kristol, whose mouth must be permanently stuck in a pucker from sucking on sour grapes since the neoconservative movement bombed, was of course equally indignant.

BUT A LOT OF US voted for Barack Obama for exactly the same reason the Nobel Committee did:

"Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future."

The committee's decision was unanimous and reflects its predilection toward multilateralism, a word likely missing from our last president's vocabulary.

It's time to give peace (and our new president) a chance.

NOTE: I first wrote this blog entry back in March of 2008 and my opinion has not changed. I have, however, gotten to know some of the folks involved with this measure. I think they are well intentioned, but have a measure which has some clear problems, including the overly restrictive 26-foot moratorium, which they themselves have admitted was a mistake.

I also wrote an exhaustive entry back in February on the good work the already-established View Protection Task Force has accomplished toward protecting our views.

In general, I am not a big fan of the ballot initiative process. On the state level, it has been hijacked by special interests who have tied up a good portion of the state's general fund with costly mandates which are difficult to later overturn. These measures have contributed mightily to our state's budget difficulties.

HERE IS A PORTION of my March 2008 entry on what is now known as Ventura's Measure B:

Here in a nutshell is what you'll be voting on: The establishment of a View Resources Board made up of people appointed for the most part by a special interest group, the Ventura Citizens' Organization for Responsible Development (VCORD). This group would then draft restrictions on building heights which would affect approximately 93 percent of the properties in the city.  VCORD was originally set up as a watchdog group to keep buildings from springing up which block views of the hills from the bungalow homes in Midtown.

I called City Attorney Ariel Calonne and asked him to clarify the legalities of the measure. Letting the board of VCORD, a 501 (c)(4) political organization, decide who appoints the View Resources Board violates the City Charter, he said.

"I'm not for or against it," Calonne said of the measure. "I've given an opinion that a lot of it is illegal."

It's like letting the ACLU appoint judges, or letting the AFL-CIO appoint the National Labor Relations Board or ... well, you get the picture.

AND THERE'S MORE. If the initiative passes in 2009, a moratorium restricting building heights to just 26 feet will be put in place for up to 2 years until this board is appointed and drafts a view protection ordinance, with the contents still to be determined.

The ordinance is intended as a General Plan amendment, yet the process completely bypasses legally required review by the Planning Commission. Whatever the board comes up with will eventually be voted on by the City Council. If they vote it down, the measure will go to the voters in a far-off municipal election. If that fails, then what?

To their credit, VCORD has exempted a few business areas such as Downtown, Victoria Ave., and the hospital zone.

If you're looking at your property as an investment, be aware that potential buyers may be casting a wary eye your way. If the measure passes, the city's already established guidelines will then be in limbo and it could be a significant time before you will know what can be built there.

The City Council and a majority of the citizens support protecting public views and the quality of life in Ventura. But this is not the way to do it.

The city attorney's analysis of this measure can be viewed here: Download file

The Community Development Director's analysis of the measure can be found here: Download file

I HAVE BEEN a big supporter of San Buenaventura Friends of the Library's dogged efforts to save their beloved Wright Library from closure due to cutbacks in the Ventura County Library System. They've done event after event and even invited science fiction legend Ray Bradbury to be the featured speaker at a fundraiser. So far they've raised $92,000.

But there comes a time when even the most devoted volunteers get tired. Volunteer-driven fundraising efforts cannot always be sustained. I've been there, done that myself when in 2003 as part of an equally determined group of moms we raised $84,000 to save the School Resource Officer program in Ventura's middle schools for just one year. We couldn't do it again the next.

So the Friends are pinning their hopes on the passage of Ventura's Measure A, the 1/2-percent sales tax measure on November's ballot. The estimated $8 million raised locally by the measure would stay in Ventura and wouldn't be subject to a raid from Sacramento. The state is taking $4 million from the city's now balanced budget to solve the state's budget crisis -- "borrowing" $2.8 million in property taxes and taking an additional $1.2 million from the city's Redevelopment Agency.

The spending plan for the revenue measure, which sunsets in four years, would do much to restore some of the service cuts our older, full-service city has had to make in the last few years to balance the budget. Supplementing the county's funding for our libraries would keep Wright open and maintain hours at our other library facilities.

Today the Friends and other community leaders and local families officially kicked off the campaign for Measure A in front of the Wright Library. The measure has broad community support if the endorsement list is any indication. On the growing list is the Ventura Auto Center Dealers Association and other local business leaders. 

SBFOL President Will Thompson put an impassioned plea in the group's latest newsletter: "So, it will be up to us voters to save Wright Library. ... We are, in the face of so many voters in previous elections who just said "NO," the voters who now have the opportunity and the privilege to say "YES." We love Ventura and are eager to save our Wright Library!"

WHAT WILL Ventura County be like in the year 2035 with an estimated 200,000 more people and how can we start planning for it today?

That is the task participants were charged with last week at the first of Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County's citizen workshops. The Compact is a broad partnership of the 10 cities, the county and various agencies, along with the Southern California Association of Governments, which funded the exercise.

The workshop was led by Ted Knowlton of the Planning Center who ran through a series of questions for the group before we began a mapping exercise. The consensus? Most of us felt with that with 200,000 more people, the quality of our lives would likely suffer.

According to baseline projections for 2035 on the group's website, the hours lost to traffic congestion will increase by 166 percent and carbon dioxide emissions from automobiles will go up 129 percent. We'll need almost $1 billion in new local infrastructure projects to handle the population.

And so we began in small groups to tackle the task of what urban planners should do to make life in the future comfortable for residents.

With a map of the county spread out before us which tracked where development and protected open space lies, we were given paper tokens for future housing and commercial areas, along with colored tapes for transit, freeways and hiking trails. 

OUR GROUP decided to invest in more mass transit opportunities with town centers situated near transit stations. These areas would encompass living, shopping and high-wage centers in one spot. To do this we had to trade in most of our single-family home tokens, a decision that didn't sit well with everyone in the group. We didn't add major highways, but added connector roads instead to alleviate congestion on major thoroughfares and freeways.

The exercise was a bit like playing Monopoly and just like that drawn-out game, we didn't quite get finished before it was our time to present.

Our Ventura workshop was just one of several scheduled throughout the county last week and next. Our input will be compiled and will help shape future planning decisions. It was a good learning experience for everyone.

What is apparent is that our single-car commuter lifestyle is not sustainable. New federal and state laws will also change the way we plan. And the sooner we change our existing mindset the better.

Now it has been widely reported that the recalcitrant "Just Say No" crowd, including our own State Sen. Tony Strickland has just added to the pain our cities will feel as the state takes $2 billion in property tax revenues away from local governments  to balance its own budget. These gaps will leave cities scrambling to plug holes they thought they had already filled in their own budget-balancing woes this year.

While the state is obligated to pay the money back in 2013 through provisions in 2004's Prop. 1A, most local officials I talk to don't really believe it will happen. 

So cities and counties were counting on Senate Bill 67 to pass in the whirlwind of the last legislative session which ended Sept. 11. This was "cleanup" legislation which would allow a consortium made up of the League of California Cities and the California State Association of Counties to accept the state's IOUs for the borrowed property tax and issues bonds to local governments to make up for the loss.

But this legislation, along with other bills which required a 2/3 passage, got hung up in a political snit over several unrelated matters, including a vote sought by Republicans on behalf of Intuit, the makers of Turbo Tax, to deny tax preparation services to low-income people through a program called ReadyReturn. The Santa Rosa Press Democrat and the Los Angeles Times took Strickland to task for his part in this scheme. Strickland has accepted $1 million in campaign cash from Intuit, the Times pointed out. And this OpEd piece points out just how wrong Intuit is in pursuing this matter.

Also lost in this power play by the No Crowd was money for battered women's shelters, federal money for swine flu preparations and a bill allowing the state to renegotiate letters of credit with banks, saving the state about $850 million this year.

Sen. Abel Maldonado, R-Santa Maria, was the only one to break from his party and vote for the measures. "At the end of the day we were sent to Sacramento to govern, not play politics," he told the Lompoc Record.

BY THE WAY: If you are looking for more Republican non-responsiveness, look no further than Mike Stoker, Tony Strickland's aide and big-time polluter Greka Energy's spokesperson, who is running for the 35th Assembly District seat along with Susan Jordan and Das Williams. I watched him in action at a forum put together at a Gold Coast Hispanic Chamber of Commerce breakfast last week by The Paladin Principle, Republican Assembly District 37 candidate Jeff Gorell's firm. The press was of course alerted to this breakfast forum, attended by 18 people. 

Stoker's idea of debating is apparently interrupting and shouting over his opponent's voice. He isn't much of a listener.

JUST WHEN I THOUGHT the hysteria from rightwing media couldn't get much worse, I learned about the protests against President Barack Obama's televised pep talk to students today.

A sample of today's speech:

But at the end of the day, we can have the most dedicated teachers, the most supportive parents, and the best schools in the world - and none of it will matter unless all of you fulfill your responsibilities. Unless you show up to those schools; pay attention to those teachers; listen to your parents, grandparents and other adults; and put in the hard work it takes to succeed.

That's right. Our president wants your kids to be better learners and do their homework. Similar speeches were delivered by presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush and shown to schoolchildren.

But leave it to a few shock jocks like Tammy Bruce to stir the pot and look for a sinister agenda. Per Bruce's Twitter feed calling for parents to pull their children out of school today rather than watch a televised speech from the president of the United States:

Remember, *you* are the moral tutor of your child, not some shady Chicago lawyer and his sycophants.

Bruce, formerly a Democrat, says she's now disavowed any party affiliation but chooses to do political commentary for FOX News.

And then we have 2012 presidential contender Gov. Tim Pawlenty also questioning the speech, calling it "uninvited." According to a radio interview, "the Republican governor says showing the address could be disruptive and raises questions of content and motive."

"I think we've reached a little bit of the silly season when the president of the United States can't tell kids in school to study hard and stay in school," presidential spokesman Robert Gibbs said last week.

AT MY HOUSE, I realize my strong political opinions have permeated my children's belief system. When my youngest brought home a presidential scholarship award signed by Obama he couldn't resist pointing out to his older sister in a bit of triumphant sibling rivalry that hers was (alas) signed by George Bush.

But I've also taught them to respect the office. And no matter how much you disagree with a sitting president's politics, you owe it to your children to teach them that the great traditions of this country and our system of democracy should always be honored.

The text of Obama's speech can be found here.

While I don't doubt for a minute some of these anti-reform folks are genuinely concerned about the future of their health care, I can't help but suspect most of these protests are really just political theater for Republicans. A recent fundraising appeal for the GOP even hinted that Democrats would use reform efforts to deny health benefits to only Republicans. Oh brother.

It's a wedge issue for a party in decline and they have seized upon the media's penchant for covering controversy before substance. Lost in many news stories are the thoughtful discussion at these forums. We instead hear about the finger pointing and hurled insults.

Not that Democrats haven't pulled similar stunts themselves.

BUT THIS IS A DEBATE we really need to have in a reasoned, thoughtful manner. We all know our health care system is broken. The World Health Organization released an enlightening study in 2000 that showed the U.S. has the most expensive health care system in the world yet we rank only 37th in overall performance. What do we get for our money? It has been estimated that 19-24 percent of the total dollars spent are just on administrative costs for our complicated multi-payer system.

The health care system reflects our world of haves and have nots. And in this sort of world if you don't have the money for a Rolls Royce, you don't go out and buy one. But an appendectomy is not a luxury item and you can spend your life savings paying off a medical debt. These bills account for more than 60 percent of all personal bankruptcies.

Even those with good health care plans can be just one step away from panic. It happened to my own family. When my husband lost a good job years ago in the tech crash and became self-employed, we were forced to go out and buy our own insurance. The providers were happy to insure my healthy family, but I was denied coverage for a minor digestive disorder which nearly half of middle-aged adults have. Go out and buy high-risk health insurance from the state at exorbitant premiums, I was told.

I HAVEN'T FORGOTTEN THAT. And I am sick at heart over what is happening to one of my dearest friends. A pillar of the community, she and her family are wracked with debt from expensive surgeries and treatments to fight a cancer raging within her body. Battling this disease is trying enough without having to worry about losing your house, too. 

There is enough real-life drama out there. It's time to end the political theater and get to work.

Unlike Gallegly -- who has yet to host a forum -- Congresswoman Lois Capps will co-host  a community information session on comprehensive health insurance reform for residents of the 23rd Congressional District on Friday, Sept. 4 from  6 - 7:30 p.m. at the Bethel AME Church, located at 855 South F Street in  Oxnard. Joining Capps in co-hosting the event are local faith community  members, including Pastor Robert Cox, of the Bethel AME Church. The Ventura County League of Women Voters will assist in administering this event. Capps will discuss comprehensive health insurance reform legislation being considered by Congress and answer audience questions about the legislation.

The indefatigable Jerry Brown hasn't even officially declared yet and has already raised seven times as much money as his nearest Democratic competitor, Gavin Newsom, a likeable but flawed candidate.

On the short list of alternates often mentioned is Jackie Speier, a dynamic freshman Congresswoman from San Mateo. So when I was recently invited to hear her speak at a luncheon hosted by the Democratic Women of Santa Barbara County, I happily accepted.

With a friendly nature, indomitable spirit and ambition to spare, the popular Speier spent 18 years in Sacramento in both the Assembly and the Senate and was elected with 75 percent of the vote last fall to the 12th Congressional District. She lost a primary contest for lieutenant governor in 2006 by a very narrow margin to John Garamendi.

Few in the mostly female audience disagreed with her assessment that we need more women in public office. "The fastest way to change society is to mobilize the women of the world," Speier said, quoting Charles Malik, former president of the United Nations.

But while California has two female senators, currently only 17 percent of the U.S. House is female. And giving up her House seat to run for governor would be a "difficult" decision, she said.

But we urgently need someone who isn't afraid to stand up to the special interests, Speier maintained. "I won't support anyone who won't take on the prison guards union."

That's a pretty fearless statement considering the California Correctional Peace Officers Association is one of the most powerful unions in the state and has funded many an independent expenditure attack on candidates who cross them.

But Speier is well known for her courage. While a young staffer to Congressman Leo Ryan in 1978, she was part of the delegation ambushed in Guyana by members of the Peoples Temple. She was shot five times, left for dead and waited 22 hours for medical attention. Congressman Ryan and four others were murdered. The next day, more than 900 members of the cult committed suicide.

In 1993, Speier's first husband died in a car crash while she was pregnant with their second child.

AND SO, IN COMPARISON, political obstacles seem far less formidable. She's been a prolific legislator with more than 300 bills signed into law, many focusing on consumer protection issues and financial reform, and she chaired the state Senate committee investigating fraud in state government. On her first day in Congress, she delivered a gutsy but rousing speech against the Iraq war.

Speier recently held a town hall forum on health care in her district which was peaceful. "There is no point in pursuing health care reform without a public option," she said. What would she do to fix California politics? Get rid of term limits (which give us a perpetual crop of rookies) or limit each legislator to 12 years, jettison the two-thirds vote needed to pass a budget and bring on open primaries (which will encourage moderates).

So perhaps instead of a fake action hero for governor, we've found a real one.

Go Jackie!

IT SOMETIMES TAKES the threat of losing an old friend to make you appreciate just how much you need him, and so it has been with the announced closing of the H.P. Wright Library in Ventura.

A source of comfort, entertainment, and a home away from home for many Venturans, the Wright is a victim of budget cutbacks in the County Library System. The closing has sparked an uprising of sorts in Ventura which has secretly pleased me. To see an organized effort of this sort for a facility of knowledge is truly remarkable in an age when so many other things compete for our attention.

Long supportive of efforts by the San Buenaventura Friends of the Library to privately raise money to keep the facility open, I recently joined a group of my fellow Venturans on the newly convened Ventura Library Plan Steering Committee.

In these dog days of budget cuts, our group of motivated citizens is the substitute for the $100,000 library plan exercise axed from the city's budget last year.

"It's time to have this conversation and see it through to the end," Deputy Mayor Bill Fulton told us last week.

The Wright is losing its lease from Ventura College in 2015 and chances are it won't be renewed. A smaller facility than the E.P. Foster Library Downtown, it's unable to house the collections of both libraries and does not have a meeting room or computer center. The much smaller Avenue Library receives money from federal sources. So the Wright was targeted for closure by the county in an effort to consolidate and save money it doesn't have any more.

But it's the most popular library in the city, with a circulation of 210,556, thus the uprising.

San Buenaventura Friends of the Library has raised enough money to keep the facility open until late October. If the Ventura sales tax measure passes in November, with the added revenue, the facility could potentially stay open until the lease is up in 2015, at least. If not, well, it's likely the Friends will give up the effort and the facility will close.

A DENIZEN OF THE EAST END, I must admit to traveling more frequently to the Oxnard Library when my children were very young in the late '90s. A larger, newer facility with a better children's collection, the city-run library had predictable hours, which our three Ventura libraries have never had. The now-closed bookstore Adventures for Kids drew us out as well.

But we've also spent time in the comfy beanbag chairs at the Wright, talked to the friendly librarians who obviously love their jobs, and watched the students trail over from Foothill High after school.

The city has property available in the Community Park on Kimball Road near the 126 Freeway to build a large, new facility for the entire city, but doesn't have the funding identified. I envy the cities of Camarillo and Oxnard for their new state-of-the art facilities. In 1997, a comprehensive study recommended the city withdraw from the County Library System altogether, but we never followed through.

LIbraries of the future may need to look very different than they do today. Books can be downloaded digitally and reference materials are available online. When surveyed, our group lamented the lack of community programs and activities offered in Ventura libraries. Meeting facilities, an auditorium and possibly a coffee/juice bar would be great additions.

Our group has a big, lumpy piece of clay to mold. Citizen input will be very important. The entire community is being invited to weigh in. The idea is to have a strategic plan to present to the council by May of 2010.

Your constructive thoughts are welcomed in this space, or you can send me an email.

By November I expect the visual pollution to be out of control with 16 council candidates and three ballot measures cluttering our political landscape. Early signage does not win votes at my house. If you excessively pollute my visual space, expect a thumbs down from me. Most studies show campaign signs don't have much effect on voters.

While I see a few familiar names in the mix and the four incumbents, of course, what always amazes me are the candidates who have not been active participants in city projects, committees, commissions, meetings and charettes. Our local government urgently needs volunteers, especially in these days of reduced staff due to budget cutbacks.

It's just the same handful of us traveling from event to event. In addition to the Cultural Affairs Commission, I've joined the Visitor's and Convention Bureau Board and recently agreed to serve on the Library Plan Steering Committee. This is in addition to the numerous other boards I sit on.

THE TRUTH IS, the city needs good volunteers a lot more than it needs 16 City Council candidates and while volunteering doesn't put your name in lights quite like running for office does, it is far more fulfilling.

Becoming a city volunteer is an excellent way to learn about how your local government works. In an era when cities everywhere are faced with tough decisions with myriad implications, I don't want somebody on the City Council who has to play catch-up. Governing a city is no small task and if you haven't read the General Plan, gone through the Capital Improvement Project Plan and can't explain the term "triple flip" or how SB 375 will impact the planning of civic projects in the future, you won't have my vote.

If you don't have the time to wade through inches-thick staff reports every week, answer 100 emails and dozens of phone calls daily, attend ribbon cuttings, mixers and endless outside meetings all for $600 a month, don't bother.

If you are interested in making an impact at the local level, consider volunteering first. You won't regret it.

California's governance process has followed a parallel evolution and now that the economy has tanked, all the nasty underpinnings are sticking out for the world to see. Ventura County Star Sacramento Bureau Chief Timm Herdt, a panelist at the Repair California event held Monday at California Lutheran University in Thousand Oaks, said he has watched one too many deals made in the wee hours of all-night budget sessions in the legislature: "Now they only have one trick in their book and that's sleep deprivation."

A Bay area businessman, Wunderman says he has been joined in his efforts by a cross section of political groups like Common Cause, The New America Foundation, The Courage Campaign, Orange County Lincoln Club and Joint Venture - Silicon Valley Networks. Others are coming on board.

With so much contributing to the state's dysfunction, agreeing on what to fix may take some doing. For example, the Commission on the 21st Century Economy is currently locked in a partisan battle on tax reform. But Wunderman outlined the following possible issues for a state constitutional convention:

• Eliminating the 2/3 requirement to pass a budget (but not necessarily the 2/3 to pass a tax increase.) California is the only state to require a 2/3 vote for both.
  
• Revising the fiscal inequities which exist between Sacramento and local governments because of Prop. 13. "They didn't exactly intend for what's happened to happen," Wunderman said of the drain on funds for cities and counties.
• Election reform. "It's a special-interest controlled mob up in Sacramento right now. ... The short terms in the Assembly have given it rookie-league status so they operate at the behest of special interests and staff, the only ones who have experience."
• Reforming the ballot initiative process. "It wasn't intended to become what it's become. It's been taken over by special interests." Initiatives of the future could have sunset clauses and a requirement to reveal economic impact.
• Requiring performance measures for established programs.
  

THE CURRENT SYSTEM SPECIFIES that the legislature must call for a Constitutional Convention. But Repair California wants to bypass them and go directly to the voters with it. Once the Attorney General's Office issues titles and summaries for a proposed ballot measure, the group has only 150 days to gather 800,000 signatures to qualify it for the November 2010 ballot. The convention would take place in 2011 and the delegates' reform package would be voted on in November of 2012. 

How would the citizen-delegates be chosen? Herb Gooch, a political science professor at CLU, told me he thought they should be selected by Assembly district with all potential candidates voted on by the public.

While seasoned Sacramento hands like Herdt believe special-interest lawsuits will torpedo these efforts, the folks behind Repair California remain optimistic. If the packed room on Monday was any indication, the will is there.

"The people have the power to change this and nothing can stop them," Wunderman said.

THERE'S AN EXPRESSION called "Hawaiian Time" which loosely means you get around to it when you can. It's the laid-back attitude of the island of Kauai which I just spent the last nine days visiting. So in the aloha spirit, please forgive my week-late commentary on last week's state budget vote. Also in the Kauai spirit, I dedicate this blog to the island's unofficial birds: the wild chickens that roam loose everywhere on the island.

My fellow Democrats in the state legislature: with some notable exceptions, you generally lack spinal columns. How is it possible that the majority party with all public polling on its side kowtowed to the minority Republicans and our governor in slashing billions to schools, children's health insurance, state parks, the elderly, sick and disabled?

Why, when recent polling showed that over 70 percent of voters, across party lines, supported a cigarette and tobacco tax increase that could generate $1.2 billion a year, did you discard the idea? (We are number 32 in the nation in such fees. Forty-six other states have raised their cigarette tax rate a collective total of 93 times since California last raised its tax in 1998.)

Why, when other polling showed that 73 percent supported oil extraction fees like every other oil-drilling state has, did you also discount that plan? These fees could generate $1.3 billion a year.

Big Tobacco and Big Oil have spent millions fighting these ideas and you let them win.

Why did you instead agree to let the state borrow or take billions away from our cities and counties, leaving local governments to further cut their own decimated budgets? The City of Ventura alone will lose an estimated $2.76 million this fiscal year to Sacramento's budget debacle, according to a calculation tool provided by the Sacramento Bee. These grabs are sure to trigger lawsuits.

Another tip: Our unions want to save jobs, too. Bring everyone to the table to talk and don't let wedge issues like public employee pension reform be used as last-minute ammo by our governor in the next budget talks.

AND NOW FOR THE EXCEPTIONS:  Kudos to State Sen. Fran Pavley, (D-Agoura Hills) who refused to vote for the raid on local gas taxes which would cut street repairs to cities, according to Star reporter Timm Herdt. The Assembly fought that one back, too. Pavley also voted no on over $334 million in reductions in state spending for developmental services.

More no votes from Democratic Senators Gil Cedillo, Lou Correa, Mark DeSaulnier, and Leland Yee on the main budget bill forced perennial Republican no voters Sam Aanestad, Roy Ashburn, Dennis Hollingsworth, Bob Huff, George Runner, and Tony Strickland into voting yes. This time around they won't be able to issue hypocritical press releases afterward saying they didn't actually vote for these cuts.