The California Supreme Court wants the state Attorney
General's Office to respond by Thursday to a legal petition filed by local defense
attorneys that challenges the constitutionality of a statewide policy called "flash
incarceration."
Attorney Michael McMahon, a chief deputy with the Public
Defender's Office, filed the writ last month on
behalf of Adam Vanstane with the Supreme Court asking it to review the policy
which, he says, allows some parolees in the state to be put in jail for up to
10 days without any hearing and based solely on the strength of county probation
officers' word.
"The parolee doesn't have the right to be heard or call witnesses
or defend himself or herself," said McMahon
said Friday.
The case landed in the state Supreme Court because the writ of mandate was
rejected without a hearing by a Ventura County Superior Court and the appeals
court in Ventura.
McMahon said this case could wind its way to the highest court in
the land.
"I don't say this
often. This issue could go all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court," he said.
McMahon said the state's highest court could decide not
to hold a hearing on this case or could order the appeals court to conduct one based on the issues raised by McMahon.
Michael Schwartz, special assistant district attorney, said
his office joined the county's counsel in supporting flash incarceration on post-release
community supervision or PCS, arguing that flash incarceration is lawful.
Adding, "Because those released on PCS have agreed to
supervision terms, including possibility of flash incarceration, they are not
entitled to a hearing or counsel before this brief period of incarceration is
imposed."
The flash incarceration policy became effective on Oct. 1 as
part of statewide realignment.
Realignment, which was implemented as a result of the state's budget
crisis, means that nonviolent criminals who haven't committed sexual offenses
are transferred to county jails to serve their sentences instead of prison, making
these inmates when they get out under the supervision of the county probation
department.
The parole officer doesn't need any type of court order to
put a realignment parolee in jail for up to 10 days for such infractions as
showing up late to a meeting or associating with relatives who may be gang
members, according said McMahon.
McMahon believes that flash incarceration has been used
hundreds of times in Ventura County, including one time about a month ago when a parolee was sent
to jail for arguing with another restaurant patron.
The case can be viewed at: http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/dockets.cfm?dist=0&doc_id=2009239&doc_no=S201150







