If you are not redirected automatically, follow at http://95percent.blogs.vcstar.com/

7 questions, only 1 potentially

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar

7 questions, only 1 potentially fatal

Proponents of Proposition 70, the Indian-sponsored initiative on the Nov. 2 ballot which would allow unlimited slot machines at casinos on reservations in exchange for tribes paying the equivalent of the state corporate income tax on their profits, held a news conference this morning to unveil what they called "the 7 deadly questions" to ask Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger regarding what they called "the cash register chaos" of the new deals he's been negotiating with selected Indian tribes.

In fact, six of the questions were somewhat arcane, legalistic or just plain confusing to anyone except the most passionate followers of the complicated gaming issue.

But there is one element of the issue that nearly everyone understands: Will tribal gaming eventually lead to the development of casinos in the state's major urban areas? A clear majority of Californians wants the answer to that question to be "No!"

Given the governor's popularity and opinion polls that show the two gaming initiatives on the November ballot losing badly, what Prop. 70 advocates need is one truly deadly question that will raise doubts about Schwarzenegger's credibility on the issue.

This could be it: "Why do you continue to say that you oppose urban casinos and then do everything you can to make San Pablo the biggest casino in the Western United States?"

San Pablo is an existing card club just east of San Francisco, a stone's throw from the Bay and just minutes away from downtown Oakland and the San Francisco Peninsula. In August, Schwarzenegger negotiated a deal that would have allowed 5,000 slot machines there more than any of the glitzy gambling halls on the Las Vegas Strip. In the face of fierce and instant opposition in the Bay area and from legislators, the Lytton tribe quickly agreed to cut that number in half, with the proviso that it could be renegotiated in a couple years.

Even at that, legislators refused to ratify the proposed deal, and Schwarzenegger had to withdraw the proposal in the closing days of the legislative session.

Proposition 70 would limit Indian gaming to existing reservations. "It's transparent. It's out there. There's no question about it," said Gene Raper, spokesman for the Prop. 70 campaign.

And what's Schwarzenegger's position on urban gaming? "The governor seems to be fickle on it," Raper said. "We're not."

Said Jesse Huff, the former state finance director who is a consultant to the campaign: "When the backroom deal came to light, the administration said it didn't want to do it but it was forced to do it. But when it came to light, everybody backed down. It was clear they were never forced."

Prop. 70 faces a very difficult battle, given the confusion over the competing ballot initiatives and the governor's opposition. But there is one deadly question that could resuscitate an initiative that now appears to be on life support.

Expect this question to be asked of voters in coming TV commercials:
"Do you favor large-scale urban casinos in California? Neither do we. Prop. 70 prohibits them. Gov. Schwarzenegger, in his zeal to generate revenues for the state budget, has already shown he's in favor of them if the price is right."

1 Comments

Yes, but Tim, you missed a big point:

THE INDIAN CASINOS ARE UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO PAY ANY TAX TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

So, Governator is giving tit for tat. More slot machines, more gaming in return for off-setting some of the budget shortfall and obtaining a committment of a revenue stream that state government would not ordinarily be entitled.

I agree the two propositions will be defeated. They both confuse the voters and the TV ads do nothing to make their issues more clear.

If the Democrat controlled legislature would cut spending then ther would be no pressure on the Governator to raise revenue or make unpopular cuts.

Leave a comment

95 percent accurate
Over the last 25 presidential elections, Ventura County voters have backed the winner 24 times, or over 95 percent of the time. It is one of only a handful of counties in the nation that has been such a predictable bellwether.
about Timm Herdt
Timm Herdt
The Ventura County Star's Sacramento Bureau Chief Timm Herdt on state issues and politics from Sacramento to Ventura County. He can be contacted at therdt@vcstar.com
Links
  • Flap: Yes, but Tim, you missed a big point: THE INDIAN read more