What's-in-it-for-me medicine

Share: Share on Facebook submit to reddit StumbleUpon Toolbar

The most thoughtful comment, amid all the blustering on both sides, about the single-payer healthcare bill passed by the Legislature last week that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger now says he'll veto, comes from the Legislature's resident physician, Assemblyman Keith Richman.

Richman voted against the bill last week, but not for any of the knee-jerk reasons many of the opponents raised. Yes, he thinks a single-payer system would reduce administrative costs in the system and produce a one-time savings. Yes, he believes single-payer systems work in other countries. But, he argues, it's a not a system that can work in the American culture.

European countries with government-run health insurance systems, Richman said, tend to have a "we're all in it together" approach. People can openly discuss cost-benefit issues and debate whether to either raise taxes to cover the costs of expanded services or to engage in the sort of rationing of care that would ultimately be necessary to contain costs. In the end, people can collectively agree on what approach would provide the most good to the greatest number of people.

In the United States, that's not the culture. What would inevitably happen if a single-payer system was established in California, Richman argues, is that politicians would respond to the public's desire to have access to every imaginable treatment for anyone who desired it. At the same time, politicians would be unwilling to increase the taxes that would be needed fund the higher level of care. The end result, he insists, would be that the system would become underfunded. And that would mean the state would have to start reducing reimbursement rates paid to doctors, hospitals and other healthcare providers.

Richman noted that Medicare, which has been repeatedly cited as a model by the proponents of a single-payer system, is not as rosy as the supporters suggest. Yes, it's administrative costs are low and, yes, it is an efficient system that delivers care to every American 65 and older. But the long-term financial health of Medicare is not good, he said. But, politics and the American culture being what they are, no one in Congress is even talking about the problem, Richman says.

It's a toughtful critique — and one that Sen. Sheila Kuehl and other advocates need to consider as they continue to press their case. A system that insures everyone, allows everyone a free choice of doctors and hospitals, covers just about every imaginable medical and dental care, and doesn't charge copays or require deductibles is a ultimately a recipe for a system that will cost more than voters will be willing to pay.

14 Comments

So had bad does the current health care "system" need to get until it becomes worthwhile??

Nearly a third of all Californians have no or nearly no health insurance. So when that exceeds more than half, a majority of the population, will it then be bad enough??

So a political analysis of how the Governator, who still deserves that title, can veto the bill and still gain in popularity would be warranted by Herdt.

Health Care Reform does not cover but $50 a day of long term care and only for home care. You have to pay into it for five years and then continue paying into it at over $100 per month. I think investigating long term care insurance sounds like a safer endeavor.

Health Care Reform does not cover but $50 a day of long term care and only for home care. You have to pay into it for five years and then continue paying into it at over $100 per month. I think investigating long term care insurance sounds like a safer endeavor.

Will the health reform pass. Will President Obama eventually sign it? What is the consensus? I believe it does not have long term care insurance included in it.

This is a the top long term care insurance site. They have a good online guide for long term care insurance.

Does health care reform really have any chance now after the political defeat in MA?

I am not sure that I follow what the last person was saying in their comment.

Thank you for the information. Will be back.

Good topic. You have enlightened me.

Thanks for the fantastic writing. I will be returning.

One of these comments is killing me, but I will not turn this into a pointless argument. Thanks for the good post.

Thanks for the wonderful blog. I look forward to checking back in.

Nice pick of words. Let's see what happens.

Good writing. This gives good information on the topic.

Leave a comment

95 percent accurate
Over the last 25 presidential elections, Ventura County voters have backed the winner 24 times, or over 95 percent of the time. It is one of only a handful of counties in the nation that has been such a predictable bellwether.
about Timm Herdt
Timm Herdt
The Ventura County Star's Sacramento Bureau Chief Timm Herdt on state issues and politics from Sacramento to Ventura County. He can be contacted at therdt@vcstar.com
Links
  • Teddy Allegretta: Good writing. This gives good information on the topic. read more
  • Maggie Penhall: Nice pick of words. Let's see what happens. read more
  • Jacinta Giddens: Thanks for the wonderful blog. I look forward to checking read more
  • Chanda Schellhase: One of these comments is killing me, but I will read more
  • Abel Swatloski: Thanks for the fantastic writing. I will be returning. read more
  • Sharice Lebrecque: Good topic. You have enlightened me. read more
  • Marisela Edelblute: Thank you for the information. Will be back. read more
  • Cassey Lievens: I am not sure that I follow what the last read more
  • Jon Taylor: Does health care reform really have any chance now after read more
  • Long Care Insurance: This is a the top long term care insurance site. read more