Login | Member Center | Contact Us | Site Map | Archives | Alerts | Subscribe to the paper

HomeBlogsBrian Dennert here

« Somebody call a plumber |  Main  | Jim Alger = Really Pro-choice ( Assembly 38th) »

April 12, 2006

Capoliticalnews.com=Out to lunch, not coming back

baldeagle.bmp

I was looking over capoliticalnews.com blog and I found this article.

I will sum it up for you. ( Their arguements, not mine!)

1. DDT is actually good.
2. The 99 percent of scientists that believe otherwise are a part of the liberal media.
3. And they are racist Klan supporters.

In the 1960's Rachel Carson wrote Silent Spring, which was a trigger for the modern environmental movement. It led to banning DDT in the US and it helped put pressure on Nixon to create the EPA ( Is he suddenly a liberal?).

Her book showed how pesticides and herbicides used in massive quantities are killing off our wildlife, including Bald Eagles. She warned if we continued in our ways we would end up having a Silent Spring. DDT and other problems were hurting the chances of the bald eagle, symbol of our nation from surviving.

I just can't believe he is attacking bald eagles. I have seen Bald Eagles, I have a pet Bald Eagle, and you Steve, are no Bald Eagle.


Comments

Sweet mercy. Brian, the bald eagle line is the funniest thing I've seen in FY 2006.

Posted by: Rob at April 12, 2006 05:13 PM

If blad eagles an't adapt to us spraying them with DDT we should move past the tree hugging wackos and get a new mascot.

Like a pitbull or something sweet like that.

Posted by: not rob at April 12, 2006 09:17 PM

Rob, I am just trying to defend America from those that would declare war on Bald Eagles.

Posted by: brian at April 12, 2006 09:22 PM

Thanks to the greens we have all these cases of malaria and an infestation of bald eagles.

Posted by: big sky at April 13, 2006 12:55 AM

Man, this link is going to make someone mad.

To think we would name awards after some stupid bird that can't stand up to a little DDT.

Posted by: Star Newspaper at April 13, 2006 01:22 AM

Screech, screech!

Posted by: Mr. Bald Eagle at April 13, 2006 05:54 PM

The article also attacks global warming. First Bald eagles, now penguins. If I was a sparrow I'd stay away from the next CRA meeting.

Check this link:

http://www.nrdc.org/bushrecord/airenergy_warming.asp

Mr. Bush believes in global warming, but Steve Frank does not. Why won't he support the president?

Posted by: Mr. Penguin at April 13, 2006 07:51 PM

Has Steve Frank commented yet on this entry?

Posted by: Not Ethan at April 15, 2006 09:42 PM

Editorial: Eagles' fate up in the air
Pesticides remain serious threat

April 17, 2006

Wildlife biologists rejoiced Wednesday over the birth of a fluffy bald eagle chick on Santa Cruz Island.

And, why not? It has been more than 50 years since a pair of adult bald eagles — due to the devastation of DDT poisoning — hatched a chick on any of the northern Channel Islands.



The chick emerged from its shell some 35 days after the egg was first spotted in a treetop nest by sharp-eyed biologists. The hatching thrilled the folks at the Institute for Wildlife Studies, who have been working since 2002 to reintroduce bald eagles to the island. And, there was even more good news Thursday with the discovery of another nest, possibly containing a second egg.

Bald eagles were once plentiful on the islands located off the Southern California coast, but the national bird began to disappear as DDT deposits from chemical plants, farm fields and backyards began washing into the ocean and, in turn, polluting the food chain. The now-banned pesticide causes female eagles to lay eggs with abnormally thin shells, which break before the chicks can hatch.

Up until Wednesday, the institute has had mixed results with the program. After all, catching dozens of bald eagles and moving them thousands of miles is relatively easy. The hard part is waiting for the adult birds to reproduce in a region where large quantities of DDT — most embedded in an array of marine sediments — still exist.

Yes, the birth of one, and now possibly a second, bald eagle is a good sign, although it's too early to declare the program a success. However, it does provide us with a chance to reflect on the unforeseen consequences pesticides can have on future generations.

In agriculture-rich Ventura County, which ranks eighth in pesticide use among the state's 58 counties, farmers and growers, in 2004, applied 7,283,033 pounds of pesticides to their crops.

Clearly, we are still dumping and spraying — into the air we breathe and the water we drink — too many pesticides that are harmful to people, the environment and wildlife.

As the near demise of the bald eagle shows, it's time we started paying closer attention.

Posted by: Star Editorial at April 17, 2006 06:15 PM

Who cares what the "red" star thinks about DDT or other issues?

Posted by: Big Sky at April 17, 2006 07:00 PM

I don't think Frank really believes this stuff, he just posted it to start a conversation.

Posted by: waiting for frank at April 18, 2006 11:05 PM

this website rocks

Posted by: Colton Benirschke at December 14, 2007 09:26 AM
Post a comment






Remember personal info?






Sponsored Links